Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draftnetworks predictability mock


ncfan

Recommended Posts

Ran a mock on draftnetworks draft machine using their predictive part where it calculates what and how they think things will go down.  Ran 5 rounds 

All the top edge rushers went before 16 (expected this after Sweats combine)

 

20190305_073354.jpg

20190305_073335.jpg

20190305_073255.jpg

20190305_073453.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I'd rather have Jonah Williams than Sweat. So if Williams ultimately ended up here as a byproduct of Sweat's combine, that would be ironic and great!

Id take Sweat over him in a heartbeat 

Sweat is just a freak, has the size.

People are forgetting he produced to thinking he is just a combine product (he's had double digit sacks his only 2 seasons at MSU)

And his length with those tentacles are a game changer.  Just getting your hand on the QB slows him down a little and gives others the opportunity to swarm.  Also the batting the passes.  He also is a Glue fit for our scheme.

Its a lot easier to find a RT in FA than a edge like him in FA or later rounds

Also our staff loves him, as you saw they brought him in to really talk scheming with him.

The thought of him standing rushing om the edge is frightening, Jason Taylor esc

 

 

But he will likely be gone, dude just put up better #s than Clowney at the Combine (including 3 cone and shuttle which is the big thing to look with edge rushers)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You're right. They won't take him because he won't be there (and because they're signing Foles). As for whether or not he sucks, we'll see. I definitely have my doubts about him in the NFL.

well there's that but i'm talking about the OP mocker. Even if murray was there, why would jacksonville take him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RumHam said:

well there's that but i'm talking about the OP mocker. Even if murray was there, why would jacksonville take him?

If they were smart and the draft fell that way they'd just open up the auction block for that pick. I just think he ultimately goes #1 to Arizona. Kingsbury wants him. Why hire Kingsbury if you're not drafting Murray? I can't see him lasting until #7 without someone taking him or someone trading down for someone else to take him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They're sneaky good.  Very good.  And they had the personnel to match perfectly against us.   Seattle played really straight forward cover-2 and cover-3 pretty much all day.  They had some nice simulated pressures in cover-3 that baited us to move more quickly than we needed to.  They just totally cooked us.  It was a full Macdonald checkmate against Canales & the offense.       The recipe: Contain the run game enough (check) and have the LB & secondary athleticism to shut us down in the air (check)      For any team that can match our OL's run blocking, just run a cover 2/cover 3 all-day.  Similar to what the Saints did.  Pepper in some simulated pressures to bait Bryce while you're at it.  Bryce doesn't play the best against zone.  Huge weakness, averages like -.09 EPA/P in his career.  How that actualizes - from my eye test as a silly fan, he just doesn't have the velocity for the shorter/intermediates from in the pocket to the outside to get guys the ball in space vs zone.  His best games (Rams, Falcons) was when they had a blitz we caught, went man, or it was a critical down with a misdirect/PA and he had the space to throw a nice ball, sometimes with anticipation.  23rd rated QB against zone.  24th completion percentage against zone.  42nd against zone ANY/A with a clean pocket.  ANY/A being one of the more consistent correlations to wins you can find out of the EPA stuff you'll see nowadays.  He doesn't even crack the top 32 for eligible QBs.    
    • well, I have always said Sam Darnold is Sam Darnold.  Which he always proves to be.  NYJ Sam was at BOA Sunday.   I think Bryce criticism is a one of one.  Because he is unicorn. 
    • JT's Stats for the 2025 season. REC: 29 / YARDS: 190/ TD: 1/ Yards per catch: 6.6 The data seems to indicate that JT is not a huge component of our offense. His presence (or lack of it) is not what cost us that game yesterday. Sanders is a big guy but he seems to go down as soon as contact is made. He hasn't produced any "wow moments" in during his 2 years with the team. So far he's proven to be a JAG. I'd rather see Tremble and Evan on the field as our # 1 and #2 TE's.  
×
×
  • Create New...