Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dave Choate of the Falcoholic grades our draft


Recommended Posts

and he's not wrong.

He makes a good point of our recent troubles getting anything after our first 2 rounds.  We've got to do better there.

 

The Carolina Panthers are at a bit of a crossroads. They didn’t fire Ron Rivera and they didn’t ease out Marty Hurney, their once-and-present GM, and the building blocks of the franchise (Cam Newton, Christian McCaffrey, roughly 3,000 pounds of defensive tackle) are still here. Yet this is not a team that can stand pat, and they were all too aware of that.

The Panthers, in case you missed out on their delightful 2018 season, started the year 6-2 and looked like they’d seriously challenge the Saints for the divisional crown. From there, they lost seven of their final eight games, including a second loss to the also struggling Falcons, and finished the year 7-9 and reeling. They went into free agency and snagged the market’s top center in Matt Paradis, added some veteran pass rushing help in the form of Bruce Irvin, locked up some of their better free agents, and perhaps most importantly fired Matt Kalil into the sun. Going into the draft, they had the look of an improved team, albeit perhaps only a slightly improved one.

The draft class, to be truly successful, would need to patch over other holes and add at least a couple of impact starters, plus depth to help down the line. Did they accomplish that?

 

https://www.thefalcoholic.com/2019/5/2/18523830/nfc-south-draft-grades-breaking-down-the-panthers-who-we-do-not-like

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ian Thomas did too.  We'll see about the rest from last year. But the year before that only Armah is still on the team,  zero from the year before that,  and only Daryl the year before that.  Maybe most teams are similar, but we haven't been hitting on much after Round 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

Ian Thomas did too.  We'll see about the rest from last year. But the year before that only Armah is till on the team,  zero from the year before that,  and only Daryl the year before that.  Maybe most teams are similar, but we haven't been hitting on much after Round 2.

As strong as Gettleman started out with Star and Short, his later drafts oooked about like later Hurney 1.0 drafts. Pretty much trash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

Ian Thomas did too.  We'll see about the rest from last year. But the year before that only Armah is till on the team,  zero from the year before that,  and only Daryl the year before that.  Maybe most teams are similar, but we haven't been hitting on much after Round 2.

Taylor Moton '17? CAP in '15? I wouldn't say Gettleman's later picks have all been disastrous, more like mediocre. His odd year drafts have been spot on. It's his even years that are the sucky ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, MountaineerChemist10 said:

Taylor Moton '17? CAP in '15? I wouldn't say Gettleman's later picks have all been disastrous, more like mediocre. His odd year drafts have been spot on. It's his even years that are the sucky ones.

 

Moton was a second round pick.  CAP is on the team for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy is not wrong.  Our later round picks have been underwhelming for a long time.  I truly think that is a result of having RR friends coaching positions instead of quality coaches who can actually develop people. I think Tepper saw that as well. I think he evaluated every part of the team and the progress they are making like any business.  I am hopeful that can change with the new experienced coaches we have added. Especially Fewell.  I am really hoping he can make something out of Gualden, Corn, Doss, And Seymour.  We don’t need Probowlers out of the later rounds, but we do need guys who can develop into serviceable depth when called upon.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a lot of teams consistently hit on 4-7 the players in those rounds are ''usually'' there for a reason. Personally I'd like to see us use our young guys earlier in their careers because sometimes you learn in the fire. I also understand the ''staffs'' potential trust issues with young players and maintaining assignments consistently.

I think Butler is a victim to a degree of being behind an All-Pro, similar to the point made in that article about Scarlett being behind CMC. Same deal when we took CAP he was stuck behind Stewart. As we know Rivera / staff stick with ''the'' guy. I'd wager if Funchess hadn't fallen apart in the same game DJ started to take over in DET, then followed that up with an injury we'd still be in the dark on his 1st round potential. As this staff over the years, rarely elevates the drafted talent, and brings them along as they like to say.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

I think Butler is a victim to a degree of being behind an All-Pro, similar to the point made in that article about Scarlett being behind CMC. Same deal when we took CAP he was stuck behind Stewart. As we know Rivera / staff stick with ''the'' guy. I'd wager if Funchess hadn't fallen apart in the same game DJ started to take over in DET, then followed that up with an injury we'd still be in the dark on his 1st round potential. As this staff over the years, rarely elevates the drafted talent, and brings them along as they like to say

Butler plays a position that has heavy rotating.  He gets about 33% of all defensive snap counts (not including special teams).  For comparison Short gets about 58-60% of defensive snaps.  

CMC, DJ Moore, Curtis Samuel just needed opportunity.  You could argue that DJ Moore should have had more chances sooner. But once these players got their chances, they showed why they belonged.

Scarlett won't be getting 1/3rd of the reps behind CMC.  Butler has had plenty of chances to bring himself along.  Its not on the staff at this point.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every year I review each pick from the previous 2 years to see how they are doing. Teams rarely hit on pick's after the 3rd round. I'd estimate a 5-10% success rate with picks in the later rounds, and it is lower the later the pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

The guy is not wrong.  Our later round picks have been underwhelming for a long time.  I truly think that is a result of having RR friends coaching positions instead of quality coaches who can actually develop people. I think Tepper saw that as well. I think he evaluated every part of the team and the progress they are making like any business.  I am hopeful that can change with the new experienced coaches we have added. Especially Fewell.  I am really hoping he can make something out of Gualden, Corn, Doss, And Seymour.  We don’t need Probowlers out of the later rounds, but we do need guys who can develop into serviceable depth when called upon.  

He is not necessarily wrong, but the success rate of all picks past the second round is pretty low, and we are about average in that regard. I read the other day that the number of fourth round players who stay in the NFL more than four years is around 4%.  For third round, its  a little better at 30%, but still not high.  It appears we got three good players out of the last draft.  If that holds true, its above average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I hope we're not going all in this year. We couldn't outright win our own division with a losing record. We had 2 anomalous wins. Typically you aren't going to win scoring 13 and have your opponent have an absolute train wreck offense.  Also, a team scoring 16 on 6 trips to the red zone is not normal either. I'm not trying to be a pessimist. We're not there. Bryce isn't there. Most of the year our offense legitimately struggled and the missing piece wasn't a TE. Keep building through the draft and reasonable FA. When we have a team that's on the edge of being able to make a legitimate SB run, then go all in. Otherwise, going all in right now feels like another Bryce situation. Sell out and pray. That's not how consistent winners are built. 
    • XL might never reach his full potential here but I think he does have a legitimate shot at becoming a pretty good #2-3. We knew when we picked him that he was raw but his athletic traits were hard to pass on.  I still remember coming here and telling 85% of huddlers to not give up on DB yet after his first couple of years here.  I just knew DB was going to special. I wouldn't put XL in that exact same category but I wouldn't write him off yet. I think our playcalling is also working against his strengths.  At the very least, we should have a servicable #3 receiver w/ speed between XL, Horn Jr, and Meetchie. 
    • I think we haven't praised Morgan/tilis enough. In this thread we have some huddles best and its hard to figure out what to do with the 19th pick, if you understand that. Im also posting what "I" believe they are doing and what I feel is best. Those FA signess send a clear signal- They are going all-in to win this coming season. If you factor that in, just believe it first, it 100% changes what going on with pick 19, cause 51st pick doesn't matter as the talent level drop is petty big between the two. So 19 is the biggest difference maker on the current plan of all-in for the 2026.  Then you factor in who will be there at, (I better hold off on my other strong thought here- I think trade up is the best help too, yes using that 3rd to do so too...) DT, ILB(Allen? he didn't run), OC, QB(ooo my I don't want to rage drool my hate again about how I feel here, plus F it draft TY simp not joking)....... those 4 groups don't have the "BPA" at 19. You can add ILB Hill in there, but I feel 19 just is too high, other disagree.  Slot or TE it is......Kenyon is the only TE worth a 1st and he's the classic draft dilemma- All sort of he's a top ten lock to he's a non-blocking one trick WR that's not even worth 2nd currency. Then there's he's the clear winner from the TE group, thus increases his value more no matter the opinion.  Honestly I see the Matt Millen outcome as the current odds favorite, I think the huddle would go bonkers for weeks as result......just the truth tho, WR had the highest odds to be the clear BPA and slot is a need...plus if we are talking about Walker being a one year deal, Coker is a one year too(he may have another controll yr, I got to confirm it tho). Plus God forbid Tmac gets hurt, the drop in talent from him or Coker to Moore is fuging scary, I'd say more than the recent OT stone fellow. It goes back back to adding talent no matter what, draft now help, and where are  the weak points are in the system you want to run....  
×
×
  • Create New...