Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I know it's preseason, but?


cookinbrak

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, ellis said:

There’s never a good time for bad football. 

But if you had to pick a time, preseason is where its at. Or practice. But not during the regular season. If they only played good football at all times there would be no need for coaching or development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/16/2019 at 11:48 PM, cookinbrak said:

I can see the offense not doing well with Cam, CMC, and Greg taking off. But should the vastly improved defense suck this bad just because Luke isn't out there?

Yes .. We are talking about a HOF LB right?? You don't replace that with a vanilla game plan and 2 guys with little to no game time playing experience.. Sorry.. We can clearly see the Bill's attacking that exact spot where normally a HOF and a 1st round draft pick would be at..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Yes .. We are talking about a HOF LB right?? You don't replace that with a vanilla game plan and 2 guys with little to no game time playing experience.. Sorry.. We can clearly see the Bill's attacking that exact spot where normally a HOF and a 1st round draft pick would be at..

That's a valid point. I'd think a personnel or formation adjustment would have been made early though. As a coach, you can't ask a player to do something they just can't do for too long. The player and the team loses confidence, and your opponent gains momentum exploiting the matchup. That mismatch negated anything anyone else was doing on the defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Navy_football said:

That's a valid point. I'd think a personnel or formation adjustment would have been made early though. As a coach, you can't ask a player to do something they just can't do for too long. The player and the team loses confidence, and your opponent gains momentum exploiting the matchup. That mismatch negated anything anyone else was doing on the defense. 

Take into account that Washington may have been calling plays

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I still think another QB is brought in Day 3. Grier is camp body level at this point.
    • We’re in a pickle. My best hope is we protect him and can run the ball vs most Ds and the WRs are healthy so he has every chance to not look like what he looked like in too many games last year.   
    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
×
×
  • Create New...