Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eagles have franchise left tackle in Andre Dillard


Glitchh

Recommended Posts

From Touchdown Wire:

The Eagles have their next franchise left tackle in Andre Dillard.

Eagles general manager Howie Roseman is one of the NFL’s most astute personnel executives, so when he made the call to move up in the first round of the 2019 draft and select Washington State’s Dillard with the 22nd overall pick, it perked up a lot of ears. Philly has veteran left tackle Jason Peters under contract through the 2019 season, and Peters is still great … when he’s healthy. Ideally, Roseman and his staff want a younger guy they can plug in as right tackle Lane Johnson’s bookend for the next few years.

So far, Dillard has fit the bill. He hasn’t given up a single pressure in 70 preseason snaps, and he’s been a far more powerful and consistent run blocker than one might expect from a graduate of the Mike Leach set of schemes. With his combination of power and agility, Dillard looks every bit a franchise blindside protector.

(I wanted Dillard in the first round, then Winovich in the second. But know-it-all types here shouted loudly what a looser Dillard was. Turns out they might be wrong.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

Now who would franchise a rookie that was just drafted not to long ago much less being in the NFL long enough to even get franchised.

LMFAO.  Are you aware of the term "franchise QB" or "franchise LT"?  Not the Franchise tag.  2 completely different things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Eagles got their guy good for them. Personally I wouldn't make a declaration one way or another about any offensive tackle 2 preseason games into their career.

Lookup the draft history yourself on left tackles in the early rounds the last several years. They go through growing pains much more often than not, and that's when they aren't outright busts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheRed said:

If the Eagles got their guy good for them. Personally I wouldn't make a declaration one way or another about any offensive tackle 2 preseason games into their career.

Lookup the draft history yourself on left tackles in the early rounds the last several years. They go through growing pains much more often than not, and that's when they aren't outright busts.

Matt Kalil looked better in his rookie year regular season than Dillard so far in his preseason and look how that turned out... The guy has never played a real NFL snap and he’s a “franchise LT” now? Give me a break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...