Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Welcome to Ron and Marty's final chance


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

There are no excuses for anything less than a winning season this year. Everything surrounding the Panthers today has been known all offseason.

Cam’s shoulder? Known.

Defensive struggles? Known.

Offensive line woes? Known known known.

These are not challenges that have sprung up recently. These are things that have been painfully obvious not just this offseason, but previous ones as well.

 Marty Hurney and Ron Rivera have addressed all these issues to the best of their abilities. The Panthers now have two promising backups to Cam Newton. The Panthers have moved to a 3-4 defense and Ron Rivera himself has promised to be calling the plays. The Panthers signed a veteran center and drafted a new offensive tackle. Problems solved? Hopefully.

But if not, and the Carolina Panthers have a slow start to the season, you can expect a quicker drop off in fan attendance and enthusiasm since the days of Jimmy Clausen.

Welcome to Ron Rivera and Marty Hurney’s last chance. Let us hope they knock it out of the park.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jfra78 said:

Is Marty's fate really tied to Ron? 

I don't see why Tepper wouldn't fire both, if that is the route he goes.

I'm not as anti-Rivera or anti-Hurney as others are (in fact, I think Hurney has done a great job cleaning up Gettleman's bad decisions), but it wouldn't make sense to only get rid of one.  It's been too long since we hired a GM and Coach in unison (Fox was fired, Hurney was kept; Hurney was fired, Rivera was kept; Gettleman was fired, Rivera was kept).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mage said:

I don't see why Tepper wouldn't fire both, if that is the route he goes.

I'm not as anti-Rivera or anti-Hurney as others are (in fact, I think Hurney has done a great job cleaning up Gettleman's bad decisions), but it wouldn't make sense to only get rid of one.  It's been too long since we hired a GM and Coach in unison (Fox was fired, Hurney was kept; Hurney was fired, Rivera was kept; Gettleman was fired, Rivera was kept).  

I agree, but it also depends on what GM is out there who's legitimately an upgrade over Hurney 2.0 (and I mean upgrade in the sense beyond "He's not Hurney so he has to be better")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Carl Spackler said:

I agree, but it also depends on what GM is out there who's legitimately an upgrade over Hurney 2.0 (and I mean upgrade in the sense beyond "He's not Hurney so he has to be better")

That's true, but I think it would be a risk Tepper is willing to take.  

But it's gonna be all good.  No doubt in my mind this team will be great this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jeremy Igo said:

Tepper isn't new to the NFL. He has been in it for a long while and has plenty of high level NFL friends. He would have no issues finding replacements for both. 

Very true and with the insane amount of free agents/one year deals that were handed out, and the fact that we have not signed Shaq/Bradberry to an extension all, to me shows that this is a make a break year. If we go with a new head coach and gm they will have a blank slate to build a team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While a lot is riding on Cam's shoulder, I still say their refusal to address LG is going to haunt them.  Maybe they thought Little would start day 1 and Williams could play G, but that is not a solid plan.  Williams is going to be a bit of a liability at LT, but if you have one at LG and Paradis does not improve his play from the NE game, we are looking at a long season.

The focus sure seems to have been on defense.

You know, it seems the OL has never been a priority. After Gross, what have we really done in the draft to address it?  Little was an act of desperation when there was a run on tackles in the draft, but you can say he was a second rounder (too little, too late?).  Turner a third rounder.  We left a C position vacated by a second rounder and former all pro to a couple of undrafted players, one coming off a serious surgery.  Throw in an undrafted LG, and a fourth rounder playing LT for the first time,  I just don't get it.  The left side of the line will determine how good this team will be--

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Ron would land somewhere else as a head coach at some point, if they fired him.

I’m not sure if Marty ever gets back to this point again if he gets fired.

Stranger things have happened: like Marty Hurney returning to the Panthers after a 5-year hiatus. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's not wrong though. You talk like a politician on here. Leaving yourself just enough wiggle room to say you never fully counted Bryce out if you need to....But we can all see it. Just say you think he is a bust outright and you will have to type a lot less. Obfuscating your opinion behind QB3 competitions etc....
    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
×
×
  • Create New...