Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did FOX “safety rules” hurt Panthers


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

Didn’t get to watch the game, heard on WFNZ that FOX shut down cameras due to the storm and that it might have hurt the Panthers a couple times. They also said that since the refs would be left with only a couple views via replay that the game should’ve been stopped until all cameras could be usedhttps://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/tv-camera-angles-lightning-storm-probably-cost-panthers-turnover-on-downs-because-of-safety-rules/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Didn’t get to watch the game, heard on WFNZ that FOX shut down cameras due to the storm and that it might have hurt the Panthers a couple times. They also said that since the refs would be left with only a couple views via replay that the game should’ve been stopped until all cameras could be usedhttps://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/tv-camera-angles-lightning-storm-probably-cost-panthers-turnover-on-downs-because-of-safety-rules/

I think it's safe to say that should have been a first, but let's be honest they had a long way to go to the end zone. It broke momentum, but the Panthers had plenty of opportunities later. They didn't deserve to win this one and I'm not going to hang the loss on this particular play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rain delay killed any momentum that Tampa Bay won from that turnover on downs. 

Then at the end of the game they gave us a VERY generous spot on that last drive on the Moore reception. 

Rivera also threw a bad challenge on the PI call and cost us a timeout at the end of the game (granted that should have been an illegal contact flag from the get go).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, ncsfinest21 said:

Someway and somehow. We will always find a way to lose. Something won't work right. Calls will be against us. Something will break down. And we will always be there at the end of the game not able to overcome the odds and be 2 inches short

That's what bad teams do

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mc52beast said:

Didn’t get to watch the game, heard on WFNZ that FOX shut down cameras due to the storm and that it might have hurt the Panthers a couple times. They also said that since the refs would be left with only a couple views via replay that the game should’ve been stopped until all cameras could be usedhttps://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/tv-camera-angles-lightning-storm-probably-cost-panthers-turnover-on-downs-because-of-safety-rules/

Serious wtf is a that poo? I mean if there is a lightning delay nobody is out, if it’s over that mean all the camera folks can go back and man their station. Ya, maybe don’t have the steady cam op out there running around with a ton of metal. But there’s a dozen other cameras at least.

The only thing I can think of is if it was before the rain delay they didn’t put the weather gear on the cameras and that was Fox’s excuse for slacking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Serious wtf is a that poo? I mean if there is a lightning delay nobody is out, if it’s over that mean all the camera folks can go back and man their station. Ya, maybe don’t have the steady cam op out there running around with a ton of metal. But there’s a dozen other cameras at least.

The only thing I can think of is if it was before the rain delay they didn’t put the weather gear on the cameras and that was Fox’s excuse for slacking. 

Likely there are union rules that govern the amount of time since a lightning strike X miles from the location. The NFL rule for the teams is 30 minutes. Seems like it was 60 minutes for FOX.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Raptors blown out by Phoenix. Man this final stretch is gonna be crazy. Seeds 5-10 in the east are separated by 2.5 games… Hawks only team “hotter” than us, and I think they’re bound to come back down to earth with a pretty tough schedule to close out the season. We have some tough games too but ones that I think are very winnable, and still some very very easy games — which we have been winning consistently in 2026. Don’t think we’ve had a bad loss against a team we should beat since the Pacers in either very early January or late December
    • My general take on the state of the team not going too in depth is this: Either Morgan or Canales (hard to say whether it’s the players or the system/coaching, and that goes for any team) has been responsible for considerable strides forward on D and a bit more productive offense, but it’s been a small sample size and we collapsed at the end of the year. I lean towards it being more Canales growing as a coach and building a culture of buy-in and getting the most out of players in the locker room. My reasoning for leaning there is that Morgan was part of the Fitterer stink and it’ll take him a while of sustained success in roster management to overcome that in my mind. Next year is a big year to see if that was a fluke or not. These big signings this offseason are exciting and sometimes teams can have amazing FA classes but more often than not those who spend big and “win the offseason” don’t show the results in the regular season.    As far as QB goes, in a vacuum I’m completely fine with the Pickett signing, he’s ok value for a backup and a huge improvement over Dalton. If Bryce went down there isn’t a huge drop off there and if the rest of the team builds on last year they could win games with him under center. I’m not sure the ‘85 Bears could win games with current Dalton under center. But the O is just so damn limited with Bryce and Pickett does not push him at all, he’s purely a backup. So I agree we I’d love to see a QB with some upside drafted, a guy who could actually push Bryce if/when he struggles or doesn’t improve any further. He’s improved steadily the last 2 years but it has been from arguably worst in league history to still below average. I’m not convinced he can get any better than purely average at absolute best. I hope he can man but I just don’t see it happening. And the longer we keep penciling him as starter the less confidence I have in this staff. Even with our unexpected relative success as a team last year sometimes you do have to take another step back to take a step forward, and that could mean moving on from Bryce, and temporarily going with a slightly worse player like Pickett while aggressively trying to upgrade the position and taking dart throws in the draft/free agency on upside players. I know, there wasn’t much available this offseason outside of Willis, and this draft class seems to be poor at QB. But I’d have preferred we try something and if it didn’t work and we took a step back then just keep trying until something hits. Rolling with Bryce is just delaying the inevitable and living in purgatory.    just my 2 cents, hope I’m proved wrong
×
×
  • Create New...