Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Shefter - Brees out 6 weeks


trueblade

Recommended Posts

Just now, TNPanther said:

NFCS looking to be a pile of poo this year. No excuse for Ron and co.

Excuses are already baked into the cake.

 

1st NFC loss was because of a couple of untimely turnovers, and a few bad bounces.

2nd NFC (and S) loss was just a fluke game where Cam was rusty, and we lost on the last play of the game because of execution.

This coaching staff ALWAYS has reasons (other than them) as to why we lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, trueblade said:

@SEA, DAL, TBB, @JAX, @CHI, ARI

2 - 4 over that stretch?

Teddy looked TERRIBLE Week 17 last season and looked TERRIBLE yesterday. They're in the same boat as us now where, as long as they keep getting putrid QB play from their guy, they can't pencil any game in as a win.

6 weeks feels optimistic too, the guy is 40 years old after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Green_Tea said:

Wonder what their record will be by the time be returns

Looking at the schedule, I'm thinking 4-4 barring other injuries.  I think losses to Seattle, Dallas, and chicago with wins against tampa, jacksonville, and Arizona.  That said, I feel more comfortable with the games that I think they'll lose than the games I think they will win, so I think 4-4 is the most optimistic and probable, but 3-5 or 2-6 are also very possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Excuses are already baked into the cake.

1st NFC loss was because of a couple of untimely turnovers, and a few bad bounces.

2nd NFC (and S) loss was just a fluke game where Cam was rusty, and we lost on the last play of the game because of execution.

This coaching staff ALWAYS has reasons (other than them) as to why we lose.

There was that one time Rivera did say "maybe it's on us" :thinking:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, trueblade said:

@SEA, DAL, TBB, @JAX, @CHI, ARI

2 - 4 over that stretch?

At best... maybe 1-5 even. Can’t see them winning on the road against SEA, JAX OR CHI. DAL is a very likely loss as well. Tampa who knows and Arizona is better than their record but they’ll probably win at least one of those. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My general take on the state of the team not going too in depth is this: Either Morgan or Canales (hard to say whether it’s the players or the system/coaching, and that goes for any team) has been responsible for considerable strides forward on D and a bit more productive offense, but it’s been a small sample size and we collapsed at the end of the year. I lean towards it being more Canales growing as a coach and building a culture of buy-in and getting the most out of players in the locker room. My reasoning for leaning there is that Morgan was part of the Fitterer stink and it’ll take him a while of sustained success in roster management to overcome that in my mind. Next year is a big year to see if that was a fluke or not. These big signings this offseason are exciting and sometimes teams can have amazing FA classes but more often than not those who spend big and “win the offseason” don’t show the results in the regular season.    As far as QB goes, in a vacuum I’m completely fine with the Pickett signing, he’s ok value for a backup and a huge improvement over Dalton. If Bryce went down there isn’t a huge drop off there and if the rest of the team builds on last year they could win games with him under center. I’m not sure the ‘85 Bears could win games with current Dalton under center. But the O is just so damn limited with Bryce and Pickett does not push him at all, he’s purely a backup. So I agree we I’d love to see a QB with some upside drafted, a guy who could actually push Bryce if/when he struggles or doesn’t improve any further. He’s improved steadily the last 2 years but it has been from arguably worst in league history to still below average. I’m not convinced he can get any better than purely average at absolute best. I hope he can man but I just don’t see it happening. And the longer we keep penciling him as starter the less confidence I have in this staff. Even with our unexpected relative success as a team last year sometimes you do have to take another step back to take a step forward, and that could mean moving on from Bryce, and temporarily going with a slightly worse player like Pickett while aggressively trying to upgrade the position and taking dart throws in the draft/free agency on upside players. I know, there wasn’t much available this offseason outside of Willis, and this draft class seems to be poor at QB. But I’d have preferred we try something and if it didn’t work and we took a step back then just keep trying until something hits. Rolling with Bryce is just delaying the inevitable and living in purgatory.    just my 2 cents, hope I’m proved wrong
    • His market value is 15.7 million. Not worth it to bring him at his age, at that price. If we were to bring in a veteran, DeAndre Hopkins is available for 2 million market value. I've said this in other threads, get Keenan Allen to play the slot. He's as good as a pass catching tight end and is market is under 7 million.
×
×
  • Create New...