Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Shefter - Brees out 6 weeks


trueblade

Recommended Posts

Just now, TNPanther said:

NFCS looking to be a pile of poo this year. No excuse for Ron and co.

Excuses are already baked into the cake.

 

1st NFC loss was because of a couple of untimely turnovers, and a few bad bounces.

2nd NFC (and S) loss was just a fluke game where Cam was rusty, and we lost on the last play of the game because of execution.

This coaching staff ALWAYS has reasons (other than them) as to why we lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, trueblade said:

@SEA, DAL, TBB, @JAX, @CHI, ARI

2 - 4 over that stretch?

Teddy looked TERRIBLE Week 17 last season and looked TERRIBLE yesterday. They're in the same boat as us now where, as long as they keep getting putrid QB play from their guy, they can't pencil any game in as a win.

6 weeks feels optimistic too, the guy is 40 years old after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Green_Tea said:

Wonder what their record will be by the time be returns

Looking at the schedule, I'm thinking 4-4 barring other injuries.  I think losses to Seattle, Dallas, and chicago with wins against tampa, jacksonville, and Arizona.  That said, I feel more comfortable with the games that I think they'll lose than the games I think they will win, so I think 4-4 is the most optimistic and probable, but 3-5 or 2-6 are also very possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Excuses are already baked into the cake.

1st NFC loss was because of a couple of untimely turnovers, and a few bad bounces.

2nd NFC (and S) loss was just a fluke game where Cam was rusty, and we lost on the last play of the game because of execution.

This coaching staff ALWAYS has reasons (other than them) as to why we lose.

There was that one time Rivera did say "maybe it's on us" :thinking:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, trueblade said:

@SEA, DAL, TBB, @JAX, @CHI, ARI

2 - 4 over that stretch?

At best... maybe 1-5 even. Can’t see them winning on the road against SEA, JAX OR CHI. DAL is a very likely loss as well. Tampa who knows and Arizona is better than their record but they’ll probably win at least one of those. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...