Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you want Cam to start @49ers Oct 27th.


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Here's the bigger question though. If he starts and looks bad, how long do you wait to pull him or do you? Do you just accept a loss to let Cam work through it, or do you put KA in and try for the win if it's still close?

At the same time, they could just give Cam the Kyle Allen play calling if he looks bad.

Just tell him to hand it off to CMC every play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Pretend for a moment that Cam is cleared medically to play at San Fran. Do you play him?

 

Facing a great defense, away on the west coast, after a bye (Ron sucks after byes). 

 

Or would you rather wait a week.

 

If he's truly 100% what's the rationale for holding him out?

Afraid he will get hurt again?

If so, what other games on the schedule this year are deemed too risky for him to play in?

Cam gets to play the easy games and sacrifice the backup in the tough ones?

Pretty amazing concept there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Tepper's Chest Hair said:

At the same time, they could just give Cam the Kyle Allen play calling if he looks bad.

Just tell him to hand it off to CMC every play.

Cam did have KA playcalling, at least in Week 1. CMC had the same basic number of touches in Week 1 (29) as he did in Weeks 3 (27) and 5 (25). 

It'll be interesting to see how this week goes. The last Bucs game was CMC's season low for touches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prior to the browns game Bosa had 1 sack all season. The Browns had Greg Robinson at LT.

Bosa is no better than Chandler Jones, JJ Watt or Calais Campbell our last 3 opponents.

Cam is either ready or he's not. Whatever happens he'd better realise that if he starts he can't roll out injury excuses again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's see how the team does in London before making the call on Cam .  If we win and Allen plays decent we stay the course and allow Cam to get back in game shape and fully healed .  The team has played well the last three weeks with Allen at the QB so lets keep it up .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s hard to say. If Allen wins vs TB he’s 4-0 this season. Do you insert Cam and risk messing up the chemistry?

Im thinking that Ron won’t want to put Cam in his first playing time since the Bucs against that 9er front. If he’s 100% and has gotten enough reps I play him vs the Titans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, SBiii said:

If he's truly 100% what's the rationale for holding him out?

Afraid he will get hurt again?

If so, what other games on the schedule this year are deemed too risky for him to play in?

Cam gets to play the easy games and sacrifice the backup in the tough ones?

Pretty amazing concept there.

It's an amazing concept because the back up wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a reminder that 49ers have wins over the Bucs, Bengals, Steelers and Browns who have a cumulative 5-15 record 

  Right now this looks like a game against a playoff team, but by the end of the season we may look back and say we should have won that.

 No doubt they are a form team on the road but this is not the team some people make them out to be. Their game against LAR this week may be their first real test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheMaulClaw said:

It's an amazing concept because the back up wins.

Which games on the rest of the sched do we feel it is OK for Cam to play in?

Bucs  (Not avail. London game, Cam's foot not ready to fly/stand)

Bye

@ 49'ers  (OUT.  Too risky, some meanies on their D)

Titans  (Prob OK to play assuming he is for sure 100%)

@ Packers  (Too cold? Shud prob stay home)

Falcons  (Prob OK? They arent too good this year)

@ Saints  (OUT.  Mean guys on D who dont like Cam, too risky)

Redskins  (Def OK.)

@ Falcons  (Maybe OK? Astroturf might be bad for his foot)

Seahawks  (Prob not?  Chancellor & Clowney are very mean) 

@ Colts  (Prob OK.  However, astroturf field is a concern)

Saints  (Maybe?  Depends on record at the time)

Looks like Colts, Redskins, Falcons (2) and Titans games he should be OK.  Def should be held out of Packers, Saints and probably Seahawks.  Last Saints game TBD depending on how season is going....if not making playoffs hold him out to save him for the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...