Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you want Cam to start @49ers Oct 27th.


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Here's the bigger question though. If he starts and looks bad, how long do you wait to pull him or do you? Do you just accept a loss to let Cam work through it, or do you put KA in and try for the win if it's still close?

At the same time, they could just give Cam the Kyle Allen play calling if he looks bad.

Just tell him to hand it off to CMC every play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Pretend for a moment that Cam is cleared medically to play at San Fran. Do you play him?

 

Facing a great defense, away on the west coast, after a bye (Ron sucks after byes). 

 

Or would you rather wait a week.

 

If he's truly 100% what's the rationale for holding him out?

Afraid he will get hurt again?

If so, what other games on the schedule this year are deemed too risky for him to play in?

Cam gets to play the easy games and sacrifice the backup in the tough ones?

Pretty amazing concept there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Tepper's Chest Hair said:

At the same time, they could just give Cam the Kyle Allen play calling if he looks bad.

Just tell him to hand it off to CMC every play.

Cam did have KA playcalling, at least in Week 1. CMC had the same basic number of touches in Week 1 (29) as he did in Weeks 3 (27) and 5 (25). 

It'll be interesting to see how this week goes. The last Bucs game was CMC's season low for touches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prior to the browns game Bosa had 1 sack all season. The Browns had Greg Robinson at LT.

Bosa is no better than Chandler Jones, JJ Watt or Calais Campbell our last 3 opponents.

Cam is either ready or he's not. Whatever happens he'd better realise that if he starts he can't roll out injury excuses again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's see how the team does in London before making the call on Cam .  If we win and Allen plays decent we stay the course and allow Cam to get back in game shape and fully healed .  The team has played well the last three weeks with Allen at the QB so lets keep it up .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s hard to say. If Allen wins vs TB he’s 4-0 this season. Do you insert Cam and risk messing up the chemistry?

Im thinking that Ron won’t want to put Cam in his first playing time since the Bucs against that 9er front. If he’s 100% and has gotten enough reps I play him vs the Titans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, SBiii said:

If he's truly 100% what's the rationale for holding him out?

Afraid he will get hurt again?

If so, what other games on the schedule this year are deemed too risky for him to play in?

Cam gets to play the easy games and sacrifice the backup in the tough ones?

Pretty amazing concept there.

It's an amazing concept because the back up wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a reminder that 49ers have wins over the Bucs, Bengals, Steelers and Browns who have a cumulative 5-15 record 

  Right now this looks like a game against a playoff team, but by the end of the season we may look back and say we should have won that.

 No doubt they are a form team on the road but this is not the team some people make them out to be. Their game against LAR this week may be their first real test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheMaulClaw said:

It's an amazing concept because the back up wins.

Which games on the rest of the sched do we feel it is OK for Cam to play in?

Bucs  (Not avail. London game, Cam's foot not ready to fly/stand)

Bye

@ 49'ers  (OUT.  Too risky, some meanies on their D)

Titans  (Prob OK to play assuming he is for sure 100%)

@ Packers  (Too cold? Shud prob stay home)

Falcons  (Prob OK? They arent too good this year)

@ Saints  (OUT.  Mean guys on D who dont like Cam, too risky)

Redskins  (Def OK.)

@ Falcons  (Maybe OK? Astroturf might be bad for his foot)

Seahawks  (Prob not?  Chancellor & Clowney are very mean) 

@ Colts  (Prob OK.  However, astroturf field is a concern)

Saints  (Maybe?  Depends on record at the time)

Looks like Colts, Redskins, Falcons (2) and Titans games he should be OK.  Def should be held out of Packers, Saints and probably Seahawks.  Last Saints game TBD depending on how season is going....if not making playoffs hold him out to save him for the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Depends, if we would have hired Wilkes and kept darnold were probably be right about where we are now. An average team fighting for a winning record and nfcs crown
    • And once again I showed you it’s been pretty even. We spent 2nd and 3rd rounders this past draft on edge rushers. No one’s going to sit here and do the math on a draft value chart etc. the only reason I even entertained this was because you said we’ve spent nothing on defense when that simply isn’t true. It also didn’t help we traded our ONLY WR worth a damn to trade up for Bryce soo… And this is kind of the issue with the anti Bryce crowd. This crowd tends to blame him for the trade up. I was team Stroud. Had the panthers not taken Young the only other QB they were going to take was Richardson. So your issue should be with Tepper, Morgan, Fitterer not Bryce.  Bryce is who he is and it was pretty obvious who he was during the draft process. Bryce is slowly developing into that guy most thought he’d be. Give him a WR like Jamo and this offense as a whole would improve greatly.  Anyone thinking he was the next Pat Mahomes or Josh Allen is clearly slow. Bryce was always going to need pieces around him much like EVERY other QB Burrow has Chase and Higgins and they’ve done nothing. After losing in AFC Championship in 2022, Burrow is 17-15. QB’s need a team around them It’s why a Jalen Hurts led Eagles team dismantled a Pat Mahomes led KC team in the SB Imo the QB’s doing the most with the least up until this year have been Josh Allen and Lamar Jackson  This year it’s Drake Maye and Josh Allen  Outside of the 3-5 elite type QB’s I’m not really sure what people expect here. Is Bryce ever going to be in that elite category? Nope. Should we punt on Bryce and keep swinging? I don’t think so. Should we keep swinging while hanging onto Bryce? Yeah but I don’t know what that looks like This team as a whole isn’t very good. Offense and defense and that’s the simple truth  
    • I didn't move the goal posts. But anyone who follows football who wants to engage in a rational discussion can't argue that 10 7th round picks are equal to 10 1st rounders in value. The argument has always been we haven't spent as much on defense has we have on offense. Draft picks have value just like salary. We have not spent the same amount of draft pick salary cap on defense that we have on offense since drafting Bryce. It's not even close. Just the 2 1sts we used on Bryce, 2 overall 1sts have a value of 6000. That doesn’t even factor in DJ Moore or the 2 2nds. Bryce cost more than everything we've spent on defense in 6 damn years. 
×
×
  • Create New...