Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL: Redskins-Dolphins


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, t96 said:

Gruden didn’t even want Haskins, that was Snyder (the owner) who wanted him. He’s staying there 100%

The list of head coach candidates willing to take the job would probably shrink significantly if Haskins is going to be forced on them unless he shows something. He looks absolutely awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The list of head coach candidates willing to take the job would probably shrink significantly if Haskins is going to be forced on them unless he shows something. He looks absolutely awful.

So did Goff and Trubisky their rookie years (though yes Trubisky has sucked this year too) and the Rams and Bears got great young HCs with those QBs “forced” on them. There are so few HC jobs available, I don’t think it will have any real impact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, t96 said:

So did Goff and Trubisky their rookie years (though yes Trubisky has sucked this year too) and the Rams and Bears got great young HCs with those QBs “forced” on them. There are so few HC jobs available, I don’t think it will have any real impact. 

Those teams aren't owned by Dan Snyder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Those teams aren't owned by Dan Snyder.

Here’s what you wrote:

The list of head coach candidates willing to take the job would probably shrink significantly if Haskins is going to be forced on them unless he shows something.”

 

Snyder is who he is regardless of the Haskins situation, the two have nothing to do with each other. I agree that Snyder being the owner will turn some potential coaches off. But Haskins has nothing to do with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, t96 said:

Here’s what you wrote:

The list of head coach candidates willing to take the job would probably shrink significantly if Haskins is going to be forced on them unless he shows something.”

 

Snyder is who he is regardless of the Haskins situation, the two have nothing to do with each other. I agree that Snyder being the owner will turn some potential coaches off. But Haskins has nothing to do with that.

Most owners wouldn't force a young unproven QB on his next head coach. See the previously mentioned Rosen situation. If it happens that has everything to do with the owner being Dan Snyder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Most owners wouldn't force a young unproven QB on his next head coach. See the previously mentioned Rosen situation. If it happens that has everything to do with the owner being Dan Snyder.

There have been 2 recent examples that I listed before, do you think the Bears owner and Rams owner are terrible owners, on Snyder’s level? I can understand why an owner wouldn’t want to give up on a player they’ve already made a significant investment in. Snyder has several other issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, dpm0409 said:

If you can do business paperwork while watching football and drowning in Capt Morgan, then I'd say that's a talent sir.

Believe me. I’ll start by doing all 3 and will quickly find out where my heart is at for the night. It ends in me splattered where I give up on the last one and tomorrow I try to catch up on what I missed 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...