Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Double Standard For Quarterbacks

KaseKlosed

By KaseKlosed,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Mikey818 Newbie

Mikey818

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, Pantera said:

If you play good, you remain on the field no matter your paint job.

Same goes for white running backs or corners coming outta high school Yhey are usually advised to switch to safety or maybe fullback to have a future . Regardless of their physical ability. Just ask cmc why everyone thought he was a kicker at the high school combines 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ja Rhule Grand Master

Ja Rhule

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, KaseKlosed said:

Please share the agenda for the folks? Your imgination is less than stellar 

It’s not for the folks... it’s for someone  shallow minded like you.  Most white QBs are shitty athletes.  End of story.  Once in a while you get someone like The Golden Calf of Bristol or Tysom Hill.  You either perform or gtfo.  If you can’t do the job you been hired for... you will get replaced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Mikey818 said:

Same goes for white running backs or corners coming outta high school Yhey are usually advised to switch to safety or maybe fullback to have a future . Regardless of their physical ability. Just ask cmc why everyone thought he was a kicker at the high school combines 

Young and Elway and some other old white qbs where considered dual threats.

I am not sure if ‘double standard’ is the right word so much as ‘stereo types’ but you can find them all over for everyone not just qbs and not just white and black. 
 

The sad part in life is the focus is always the injustice instead of  education. People get mad, then people get defensive. Injustices ironically strengthen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...