Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Opinions: our QB situation 2020


Jmac

Recommended Posts

If Cam comes back 100% and can play at a high level, what do we do with Allen next year. Rely on Grier as a unproven back up and hope he develops or try and retain Allen as our backup. Next year is Cam's last year under contract. What u think is the smart move?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly based on what we’ve seen from Cam lately, I say we roll with Allen the rest of this year unless he really shits the bed badly, and if he looks great and getting better then we roll with him and trade Cam.

 

Main reason for this is simply value for what they’ll cost. Cam is relatively cheap next year too but after that if he still looks good he’ll be up in the $30M range. If Allen continues to look legit, then we have him for the next 2 years under $1M then RFA and could then tag him too. That value is too damn good to pass up, and we could get some more draft capital for Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, t96 said:

Honestly based on what we’ve seen from Cam lately, I say we roll with Allen the rest of this year unless he really shits the bed badly, and if he looks great and getting better then we roll with him and trade Cam.

With every win I am feeling more comfortable with life after Cam.  Cam is going to command a lot of money and it will be hard to give an extension to someone who may not last the entirety of the contract.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hold on to Allen as long as possible and than trade him at the absolutely last moment in the described scenario 

the smartest plan if cam comes back 100% finish this season and next season strong, while primarily being a pocket passer or showing he will age gracefully at the position, do you only consider trading Allen 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, t96 said:

Honestly based on what we’ve seen from Cam lately, I say we roll with Allen the rest of this year unless he really shits the bed badly, and if he looks great and getting better then we roll with him and trade Cam.

 

Main reason for this is simply value for what they’ll cost. Cam is relatively cheap next year too but after that if he still looks good he’ll be up in the $30M range. If Allen continues to look legit, then we have him for the next 2 years under $1M then RFA and could then tag him too. That value is too damn good to pass up, and we could get some more draft capital for Cam.

Do we have Allen that cheap?  He was not drafted.  I thought he was a free agent next year---not sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

Do we have Allen that cheap?  He was not drafted.  I thought he was a free agent next year---not sure

He’s an ERFA the next two years which means he has to accept the ERFA tender or not play, and it was like $600K this year. Then after those two years he’s a RFA so a first round tender is roughly $4.5M and if no offer sheet is signed we have him for that amount (or match the offer sheet). Then we could tag him and if he’s playing at a high level that would be a bargain. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, t96 said:

He’s an ERFA the next two years which means he has to accept the ERFA tender or not play, and it was like $600K this year. Then after those two years he’s a RFA so a first round tender is roughly $4.5M and if no offer sheet is signed we have him for that amount (or match the offer sheet). Then we could tag him and if he’s playing at a high level that would be a bargain. 

Thanks.  I forgot all about (and never fully understood) the ERFA stuff.  We have a nice problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too far in the future to speculate. Cam could come back and make another MVP run and we win the Super Bowl over the Pats and then retire,..

or not,

or he sucks

or or or.

Will Grier starts after Cam and Allen both go down,.. then he really really sucks

and we get stuck with no quarterback with the 18th pick again,..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...