Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade Deadline News


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

... and/or speculation (which there will probably be more of than actual news).

Word that the 49ers are getting trade offers for backup quarterback CJ Beathard, offers described as being "in the sixth round range".

Reminder: The official deadline is 4pm tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve been saying a trade needs to be made, a reliable returner for us is worth a 5th at this rate. 
 

if our wrs are truly struggling to get open aj green is a must as far as inquiry.

whatever is needed to fix the run defense is also worth a Inquiry.

and of course any o linemen worth a damn should be number 1 on our hit list.

without looking at cap implications, turner should also be on the block, if feasible 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I'm Tepper, I'm not allowing any trades that either involve taking on new money or sacrificing draft picks. I hope he's now seen enough to reserve that for the next GM/Head Coach.

I would consider allowing trades that rid the Panthers of some high-priced contracts, if possible (ie. Trai Turner, Shaq Thompson, Mario Addison, maybe even Paradis).

What is clear is this is not a playoff caliber team, most of which is the fault of the coaching staff. Time to regroup and reload.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those hoping for AJ Green

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl-trade-deadline-bengals-redskins-frustrating-other-teams-with-stubborn-no-sell-stance/


"They are basically philosophically opposed to the idea of making trades," said one NFC GM. "It's a waste of time to call them. But we did. And it is what it is. You may as well be speaking a different language."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bartin said:

For those hoping for AJ Green

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl-trade-deadline-bengals-redskins-frustrating-other-teams-with-stubborn-no-sell-stance/


"They are basically philosophically opposed to the idea of making trades," said one NFC GM. "It's a waste of time to call them. But we did. And it is what it is. You may as well be speaking a different language."

Yeah I heard gm’s saying this for the bengals and skins 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Yeah I heard gm’s saying this for the bengals and skins 

The Bengals view AJ like the Cardinals do Fitz, it'll take a king's ransom the likes we've never seen to get AJ Green out of Cincy. But that was basically implied when Dre Kirkpatrick said the team would riot if Green was traded.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...