Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Regarding "All or Nothing"...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

I still need to finish watching y’all season, I only have I think the last episode to watch. I binged it the night it was released and was starting to crash before the last episode so I was going to save it for the next day, then my PS4 got fried in a lighting storm that day. LOL.

Could definitely see how Rivera wouldn’t want to do another show, however he may not have a choice; y’all may get forced into doing “Hard Knocks” next year if y’all miss the playoffs and keep Rivera again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Iron Saint said:

y’all may get forced into doing “Hard Knocks” next year if y’all miss the playoffs and keep Rivera again.

We just had a lousy weekend. Do you suppose you could refrain from bringing up unpleasant scenarios for just a little while? :poison:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

We just had a lousy weekend. Do you suppose you could refrain from bringing up unpleasant scenarios for just a little while? :poison:

Apologies, friend. How callous of me!

One good thing is currently there are quite a few other “eligible” teams that can be forced into doing it depending on how this season shakes out with the playoffs and which teams subsequently make coaching changes.

Eligible teams unlikely to make a HC change

  • Cardinals (Kingsbury going into 2nd year)
  • Broncos (Fangio going into 2nd year)
  • Titans (Vrabel going into 3rd year, doing decent)
  • Jaguars (as long as they don’t bomb)

Eligible teams possibly making a HC change

  • Panthers
  • Giants
  • Jets
  • Steelers
  • Lions

More than likely playoff contenders

  • Packers
  • Vikings
  • 49ers
  • Bills

So that’s 9 teams in the first two groups that are eligible (if a new coach isn’t hired) which is a big jump from last year where there were only 5 eligible teams that could’ve been forced (49ers, Giants, Lions, Raiders, and Redskins).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We now know that a team can be forced by the league to do it, as the Eagles said they were picked by the league and had no choice and wouldn’t have done it otherwise. I’d bet we were forced into as well, but who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BlazeCarolina said:

You would pay to watch ol' Bilichek have his own reality series after he hangs it up.  Do fun things to him like make him babysit 8 grandchildren alone, or survive a night clubbing with Gronk.

BB is such a good field general he would probably have the 8 kids running a run stuffing 3-4 and Gronk would arrive at 9:30 to the club to game plan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
×
×
  • Create New...