Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What incentive does a "win now, or else" coach have to think long term?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I don't think there's anything Rivera can do at this current juncture to keep his job. The team is not good enough to make the playoffs in a stacked NFC with Kyle Allen at QB. They are one Christian McCaffrey injury away from being completely inept on offense. Things are about to get really bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

 

  Spoiler Alert!

Miami Dolphins

 

I will give them credit for understanding where they were before the season started and focusing on acquiring future assets. Other teams (CIN, WAS) waited until it was too late and couldn't get the kind of ROI that MIA got in September. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ORIGINAL QUESTION:  "What incentive does a "win now, or else" coach have to think long term?"

ANSWER:  None.

 

2nd Issue -- Decision to IR a Player:

The problem with your thesis there is the decision to IR a player, Cam in this case, is a GM decision....'Boat coaches the players, Marty drafts/trades/manages the players.

In New England it's different because Belichick has control over both function but here that's not the case. 

Can't hang this one on Ol' Rowboat....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

If Rivera was coming off a recent Superbowl, Cam would have been IR'd long ago.

 

But since his only prayer of sticking around is to win this season, he has no incentive to do the right thing for the long term.

 

Yes? No?

No, because if he felt like he needed to win now, he would’ve never started Daryl over Daley last sunday

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There’s “win now” and there’s “win now”

The funny thing is the only team that never seems to need a “rebuilding” is the Patriots.  Yes same quarterback for 18 1/2 years but even the year it was Matt Cassel they went 11-5 and missed the playoffs.

every other team has to go in cycles, out with the old, draft right and bring in the right retreads,.. get an attitude, gel and peak at the right times— catch fire and go on a run.
 

if you make it,.. Broncos, Seattle, Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Indy, New Orleans,   Going through a bad cycle next— cap too maxed out, old players, stale coaches,.. bla bla bla
 

If you don’t... Panthers, Atlanta, San Diego, Jets(2 AFC Championships back to back with a butt fumble), San Francisco(Harbaugh vs Harbaugh), Arizona, go through the same crap— just with the heads down.

The win now with recent upswings makes them safer and can think a little longer term.  The ones that really stink or haven’t had an upswing in 4 seasons or more can’t think past the next few games.

I’m just wondering when the rest of the league figures out how to plug and play anyone and adjust when they have to instead of doing this stupid dance.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m always careful to draw those conclusions. But I understand the thinking. The team lost seven straight games last year. The franchise quarterback worked back from shoulder surgery. He was having a really good camp. The turf monster eats the foot in New England. And then all hell breaks loose. I give Ron some credit for holding the team together through the aftermath of that. It’s not his fault the Cam was injured in New England.

But, it certainly didn’t feel or look like he was ready to play his brand of football against Los Angeles. If I were a head coach, I would certainly like to think I would own that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will as soon as you withdraw your fandom from the Patriots. Informative threads are great but all of these estrogen and emotion driven threads you start are ridiculous.
    • Will be there tonight and expect nothing from the Canes. They are soft and won't go after anyone, nor will they respond when, not if, Florida starts bullying them. Not to mention Freddie is in net. I fear this will be an ass-kicking.  
    • Is this not a bit contradictory?  Also surely if any of us are smart enough to evaluate what we're seeing in real time, a former NFL QB can at least manage the same.  Especially considering he's basing his analysis on hours (maybe generous?) of reviewing All-22 footage which he can play back over and over again, focusing each time on different position groups, match-ups, progressions, etc. which is simply impossible for a fan to fully assess in real time.  Unless you're actually at the game, we basically only get the QB/O-line in frame during the broadcast and even in that limited window of the field, there is simply too much happening.  I'm usually broadly focusing on Bryce, maybe peeping the footwork (or lack thereof) and just the overall pocket and whether there is any pressure coming.  I'm not able to watch every individual one-on-one o-line match-up on top of it to see who got beat, who didn't pick up a blitz, which o-lineman didn't shift to help double-team, or whatever else. I think the truth is somewhere in between (as is almost always the case).  Knowing the play call, audible, etc. is pretty important when judging individual performances, which is why we should always take PFF grades with a grain of salt.  But yeah we can also get a pretty good overall sense of how a player is performing just from watching the game on the couch on Sundays.  I still think there's a lot of value in a review video like this.  As long as you have the bare minimum media literacy to take the interesting insights while also acknowledging inherent biases from a video like this (i.e. obviously focusing on the good over the bad).
×
×
  • Create New...