Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why do people have this weird notion it takes 5+ years to rebuild?


onmyown

Recommended Posts

Where did this come from? Is it the 1990s?Why do people keep saying it? I’m not talking the shitty franchises at the bottom of the barrel that are playing an endless game of NFL Minecraft who everyone seems to love to compare us to to say we’re not so bad...

I’m talking about the competent FOs. From recent memory the Eagles, 49ers, Chiefs, Rams all had pretty quick turnaround. Like 1-2 years. But I haven’t seen any team stick with the same players and coach more or less to start winning in year 5/6.

With proper front office making wise decisions and a GM drafting solid and filling the holes I see (and expect) a 1-2 year turnaround, this whole 5 year to rebuild talk is silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What Tepper said to me comes from a business perspective. The team (and it’s success) is just part of Teppers vision. Listening to Tepper he really talks about this place as a business. Rebuilding for him includes things like successful marketing, especially if Cam leaves. 

To the fans who really only care about the success of the team, it just seems people expect a horrible record for the next fives years to rebuild and recently teams have success in less time. I don’t see any reason why after two years this team can start seeing success.

He also said he came in and left things alone on the football side for his first two years. So for the team side of his business he is on year 1 for me. For his business as a whole, I’d agree Panther55, that he’s in year 2-3.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tepper said 5 years because he knows he may not get it right the first time. Yeah, ideally, we land a great head coach and reboot with who we have, depending on this season maybe even land a first round QB if the coach likes him, or maybe Cam actually gets healed up. Either way, that's the least likely outcome.

The most likely outcome is we get the best coach we can get out of what apparently is a weak class of head coaches, he comes in and makes changes, we have a bad year next year but we allow it, maybe some improvement in year 2, then year 3 comes around and we're missing the playoffs barely and everyone gets antsy thinking maybe we need to try again. Also, the last of our old guard here is fully gone (Luke), and we're paying CMC a fugton to be the guy but he's now been playing for 6 years at a crazy usage rate, so maybe he gets injuries sometimes. Anyway, hopefully the new GM is good at drafting.

Year 4 we start again with a new head coach and maybe this time the timing is right and year 5 we see a big jump like the Eagles or Rams did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BurnHurnBurn said:

The owner said it.

Exactly. The owner himself said it. I also think this team is in much worse shape than most do. We need to strike gold on a coach and a qb. And we have to replace our entire oline and the interior dline before we will be a winning franchice again. And that doesnt even take into consideration all of the good players that will be leaving like greg olson and mccoy, and even some good players that will not be resigned  as cap casualties in order to rebuild. 

 

If we get a good coach and a good qb on our first trt like we did in 2011 then we might be relevant in 3 years... or we could be headed to nfl hell with compa y like the jaguars. Jets and dolphins who have not fou d the right personel for much much longer than 5 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, onmyown said:

Where did this come from? Is it the 1990s?Why do people keep saying it? I’m not talking the shitty franchises at the bottom of the barrel that are playing an endless game of NFL Minecraft who everyone seems to love to compare us to to say we’re not so bad...

I’m talking about the competent FOs. From recent memory the Eagles, 49ers, Chiefs, Rams all had pretty quick turnaround. Like 1-2 years. But I haven’t seen any team stick with the same players and coach more or less to start winning in year 5/6.

With proper front office making wise decisions and a GM drafting solid and filling the holes I see (and expect) a 1-2 year turnaround, this whole 5 year to rebuild talk is silly.

He said that because he wants a new stadium. He would probably prefer to start building in 5 or so years, the timing makes sense. It’s all about making money and getting a new stadium. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tepper is talking about building a consistent winner, not a one and done playoff team.  It took us five years to do this last time around, though we still never managed back to back winning seasons... we at least won the division three times straight, and made the playoffs 4 out of 5 years.

I look at consistency as making the playoffs more than you miss them for an extended period of time, like a decade bare minimum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...