Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The coach that never punts


bigpoppa

Recommended Posts

Since the "Analytics" catch phrase has been thrown around so much lately, I remembered a video I watched several years ago. It's about a high school coach who took over a small program and made it competitive by going against many traditional approaches to football. 

I want to preface, that I don't see Tepper going remotely to this kind of extreme. However, I think with all I have seen from him in the past year and a half, I wouldn't be surprised if the next hire is not in the typical mold of current NFL coaches.

I am not advocating this, just stating he seems open to this kind of mindset

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw that last week as well. The issue is onside kicks have a much higher recovery rate in high school than the pros. That’s why it’s working for him. I think it’s like 20% in HS and 3% in the NFL. 
 

If a team really practiced hard and perfected it, it could work well for a while until the rest of the league caught up and got better.

I’m all for taking advantage of aspects of the game that other teams ignore though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, JARROD said:

As Chip Kelly found out about professional refs controlling game tempo unlike college, this guy will find out that pro formations and rules will cause serious retooling of his “analytics”

 

I don't know that I would call what Chip Kelly did analytics. He found a system that worked in College and tried to take it to the pro level without taking any consideration into the difference in the game. He then stuck with it intractably till the bitter end, pissing off everyone involved in the process. If anything, what he did went to the other extreme. He was unwilling to modify his game.

To be clear, I'm not saying he should hire this guy. I'm not saying that these tactics would work in the NFL. What I am saying is that I think Tepper might look for someone who isn't in the typical mold. Someone who is willing to change based on what the data states will or will not work. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Y’all got pissy when Rivera made the analytically correct move of going for 2 down 14, I don’t think you could handle a coach going for it on 4th and 17 from their own 5.

football isn’t math and high school football isn’t the pros.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, bigpoppa said:

I don't know that I would call what Chip Kelly did analytics. He found a system that worked in College and tried to take it to the pro level without taking any consideration into the difference in the game. He then stuck with it intractably till the bitter end, pissing off everyone involved in the process. If anything, what he did went to the other extreme. He was unwilling to modify his game.

To be clear, I'm not saying he should hire this guy. I'm not saying that these tactics would work in the NFL. What I am saying is that I think Tepper might look for someone who isn't in the typical mold. Someone who is willing to change based on what the data states will or will not work. 

 

Not to mention he did all this while also blowing up his roster and getting rid of a lot of his talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expect the Panthers to go for it on 4th down more than any team in NFL history in the coming years, and people will lose their mind when we fail going for it on our own 30 yard line.

It won't be as extreme as this highschool coach, but it will still shock people.

Tepper will only hire someone who sticks to the math.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What's wrong with Damien Lewis? He played pretty well last year.
    • Official NFL Cuts Tracker Deadline for roster cuts is Tuesday, August 26th. At this moment (Friday, August 22nd) the only interesting names I see are... K Caden Davis (BUF) RB Ameer Abdullah (SF) WR Equanimeous St. Brown (SF) WR Donovan Peoples-Jones (NO) LB Khaleke Hudson (TEN) Abdullah, St. Brown, Peoples-Jones I don't exactly think we should cut anybody for but it was just interesting seeing those names. Khaleke Hudson was on the Panthers' practice squad last year I believe and might have even gotten called up? And of course, Caden Davis just because of the question mark at kicker this season for the team.
    • I'll say 6/10. I don't know that we learned a whole lot about this team during preseason that we didn't already know. We didn't play the starters enough to really get a feel for what to expect. We had one good drive against the Browns, one 3-and-out and two 3-and-outs against the Texans. That's an extremely small sample size across 3 games regardless of performance. My camp/preseason takeaways: Jalen Coker might be the best WR on this team and is certainly no worse than #2. Nic Scourton is going to be a good player for us. Possibly very good. Bobby Brown was our best free agent addition. Jack Plummer isn't an NFL QB. Not even a practice squad guy. Having anyone other than Canales and Evero call plays was a really stupid and pointless idea. Our depth is largely non-existent, especially on defense. The three areas we actually DO have depth are on the OL, in the WR corp. and at RB. I can't fathom why Dan Morgan didn't do more to upgrade ILB during the offseason. We better hope Lathan Ransom steps up at FS because if he doesn't we have a massive hole. For all the hype surrounding Sanders/Evans, Tommy Tremble is still the best TE on the roster. I'm only slightly less enthusiastic going into the regular season than I was a month ago. I think our starters on offense are solid and we should be pretty good there unless Bryce totally regresses. On defense, we're probably bottom 3rd in the league if 100% healthy and significantly worse than that if injuries become an issue. We badly need at least two of our rookies to become high-level players early (ideally one of the pass rushers + Ransom) and at least 2 of our free agent additions (ideally Moehrig + Bobby Brown) to be significant upgrades over last year. Call me pessimistically optimistic 😆
×
×
  • Create New...