Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

F**k you, Florio


Jase

Recommended Posts

The Cardinals are on a strange sort of roller coaster. When everyone thinks they're good, they play poorly. When everyone thinks they're bad, they make us all look stupid. (Or, as in our specific case, stupider than usual.)

So after they did what they couldn't do last year -- win in the Meadowlands -- many thought that the Cardinals were ready to contend again for the NFC title.

And then they lost at home to one of the worst teams in the conference.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/11/02/week-eight-morning-aftermath-panthers-34-cardinals-21/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By my count, 8 NFC teams not counting the cardinals have played worse than us recently.

Lions

Packers

Bucs

Giants

Redskins

Niners

Seahawks

Rams

That's half the conference.

It's laughable that you think that the Packers, Giants and Niners wouldn't tax our asses if they played right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were statistically one of the worst. The cardinals were not. And we did loose to the Bills at home. Still to call the Panthers one of the the worst teams so early in the season is jounalistic sensationalism at its worst. We arent the Lions for f'n sake...

I will say this. The loss to the Bills will haunt us from now till season's end. A horrific coaching job that game was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's laughable that you think that the Packers, Giants and Niners wouldn't tax our asses if they played right now.

Calling it like I see it; those teams have all played below the panthers mediocrity line (PML) for the last 3 weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we are one of the worst teams in the conference.

until the panthers prove otherwise, yesterday was a fluke/aberration.

I wouldn't say one of the worst, more of a middle of the pack team, the worse teams would be Tampa, detroit, St. Louis, and the redskins.

I also think we are a better team then the Seahawks and maybe even the bears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nope Still missing it. Let's try this a different way... You have two quarterbacks from schools that ran the same kind of offense - maybe even two from the same school - on a given team (not necessarily the Panthers). One is designated the starter while the other is named the backup. Why?
    • yeah, pretty sure boss.....when things match and fit in the NFL.....the results then show it.  and when they don't, well, the results show that as well.  Bryce doesn't fit.   *but I get why late season and wants to argue with everyone Mr. Scot has also turned into a please don't talk to me about stats guy as well.  Given, the stats that reflect offensive productivity work against all your present arguments. 
    • Yeeeah...stats and rankings have zero to do with a discussion of scheme and skill set match. Maybe look up definitions of style vs ability and see if that helps. At this point, you've basically had three different people explain to you where you're wrong, but rather than addressing any of those statements, you're just resorting to straight deflection.  You don't get it. Either that or you're acting like you don't get it so that you can avoid the discussion because it's not going well for you. (that wouldn't surprise me either) 😄 Sme result either way, I suppose.
×
×
  • Create New...