Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

M. McCarthy coming up to often


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Reading the interwebs and Twitter etc. It seems that this name keeps surfacing as a head coach for the Panthers. He has no affiliation with the Steelers, but is a Pittsburgh guy.

Would like some new blood and new thinking for the Panthers....what u got,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all pretty speculative at this point.

Right now, yhere's really only one candidate with a confirmed connection to the Panthers, and that's McDaniels.

Yes, Roman is connected too, but technically he was connected to Jerry Richardson's Panthers, not David Tepper's.

You could say he's connected through Marty Hurney, but at this point we don't know how much influence Marty still has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's all pretty speculative at this point.

Right now, yhere's really only one candidate with a confirmed connection to the Panthers, and that's McDaniels.

Yes, Roman is connected too, but technically he was connected to Jerry Richardson's Panthers, not David Tepper's.

You could say he's connected through Marty Hurney, but at this point we don't know how much influence Marty still has.

Confirmed they inquired last season. Not confirmed In the current situation. Just stop. That you dont care about facts is typical 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...