Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Teh best college talent evaluator in a generations!


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

And Norwell hasn't been good for Jacksonville.. Does that make him a bad player or pick?? 

No.. He just might not fit that system scheme or environment... But he was a all pro here... 

AGAIN.. Talent evaluation and acquisition is the GM's job.. Developing the Talent and working it into a system is Coaching.. IF a player proves to be a talent in a different system or carry on to have a long career after leaving here.. The GM did his job he picked a player good enough to be in the league.. The coach didn't find away to implement that talent.. If a player falls out of the league and proves he can't make it then that is the GM'S fault..

  No. What it says is you got an All-Pro caliber player as an UDFA, with 3+ years of tremendous value. And a 3rd round pick.(Will Grier)

  Why would it matter what he did after? Nothing. His play HERE made him the highest paid G in the NFL. Not reaching for some random year in his 30.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  What is this massive scheme change? The half-assed attempt at a hybrid.3/4. That changes very little as far as secondary responsibilities. He bombed either way, in any scheme. As was predicted the minute he was overdrafted. 
 

    Is there such a thing as a bad pick? Ever? Because if players like Gaulden and Hall are not busts, there aren’t any. You used a top 100 pick on guys who could make it thru 2 seasons. Is Daryl Worley a good pick now. Hey he started, and is playing better than ever for another team. I missed where we got anything but the right to overpay Torrey Smith for it. It’s still a bad pick And always will be. 
 

      

Actually the change was both positional and scheme. Instead of a cover 2, cover 3 scheme we used when he was drafted we went to more cover 1 with man on the outside and nickel this year under Fewell.

To me any first round or second round who doesn't play is the result of  a poor choice of an expected starter. A third or fourth rounder who never develops is a missed opportunity and wasted pick. Any late rounder or UDFA who turns out well is an unexpected bonus and great pick. I guess we just have different definitions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

Oh you know it's gonna happen the minute he signs anybody in free agency.

I don't know how or why it happens, I've even bought the hype a few times since he's been back.  It's bizarre how he'll put together a roster that looks fuging loaded on paper and then it gets on a football field and is just like *fart sound*

We will get to see if it is Hurney or Rivera. If the new coach gets a lot more out of this same group next year, minus the usual player turnover, then you would suspect it is coaching. If it is more of the same then you can blame the coaching and the talent. But yeah this defense in particular has so underperformed the expectations it has been extremely disappointing. What I said then about having undersized linebackers who can't shed linemen blocks has been unfortunately too prophetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Actually the change was both positional and scheme. Instead of a cover 2, cover 3 scheme we used when he was drafted we went to more cover 1 with man on the outside and nickel this year under Fewell.

To me any first round or second round who doesn't play is the result of  a poor choice of an expected starter. A third or fourth rounder who never develops is a missed opportunity and wasted pick. Any late rounder or UDFA who turns out well is an unexpected bonus and great pick. I guess we just have different definitions.

 The coverages were a combination just like most teams. He was handed FS and was lost then back to nickel, and he only played 18 snaps. He has failed at all of them. 
 

   I actually agree with the 2nd paragraph. Just our different wording is all it is. 
 

    But he’s gone and his value to us is done. It’s about results. Not hopeful scenarios that blames everybody but the GM who made the pick. 
 

   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Toomers said:

 The coverages were a combination just like most teams. He was handed FS and was lost then back to nickel, and he only played 18 snaps. He has failed at all of them. 
 

   I actually agree with the 2nd paragraph. Just our different wording is all it is. 
 

    But he’s gone and his value to us is done. It’s about results. Not hopeful scenarios that blames everybody but the GM who made the pick. 
 

   

But he wasn't drafted as a free safety. He was drafted as a strong safety and when he couldn't start there as a rookie we got Reid and suddenly he was relegated to backup or to try a different position. And he never had the speed to play nickel or single high. And there is a huge difference in cover 1, 2 and 3 in terms of the amount of distance you cover and the speed you need to play the position.

I always wondered if Gaulden was Hurney's pick or one of the coaches. Hurney goes for the fast athletic guy who can play multiple positions and Gaulden was never described as fast or particularly athletic. I remember thinking it was a unusual  pick at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panthers55 said:

But he wasn't drafted as a free safety. He was drafted as a strong safety and when he couldn't start there as a rookie we got Reid and suddenly he was relegated to backup or to try a different position. And he never had the speed to play nickel or single high. And there is a huge difference in cover 1, 2 and 3 in terms of the amount of distance you cover and the speed you need to play the position.

I always wondered if Gaulden was Hurney's pick or one of the coaches. Hurney goes for the fast athletic guy who can play multiple positions and Gaulden was never described as fast or particularly athletic. I remember thinking it was a unusual  pick at the time.

   He not only couldn’t start, his total inability to play anywhere on a football field, meant Colon Jones did. Had to sign Reid. Who should have been signed before the season. He played 17 snaps and that was it for this whole year but one snap. And if it wasn’t his ability, why cut him? Where in all this “wasted” pick is someone who did something wrong? 
 

   And as Igo has stated many times over...Gaulden was 100% on Hurney who ignored the scouts and took him anyhow. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Toomers said:

   He not only couldn’t start, his total inability to play anywhere on a football field, meant Colon Jones did. Had to sign Reid. Who should have been signed before the season. He played 17 snaps and that was it for this whole year but one snap. And if it wasn’t his ability, why cut him? Where in all this “wasted” pick is someone who did something wrong? 
 

   And as Igo has stated many times over...Gaulden was 100% on Hurney who ignored the scouts and took him anyhow. 
 

 

Sure sounds uncharacteristic of him to ignore speed and athleticism for instincts and aggressive style. I think Hurney tried to spin it as great but he has to do that with any pick. Like do you think that Grier was Hurney's pick or heavily influenced by Norv and Scott Turner in particular. The GM is more of the operator of the draft than the guy who always gets his choice. His job is getting everyone on the same page and finding impact guys and at least contributors. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

Oh you know it's gonna happen the minute he signs anybody in free agency.

I don't know how or why it happens, I've even bought the hype a few times since he's been back.  It's bizarre how he'll put together a roster that looks fuging loaded on paper and then it gets on a football field and is just like *fart sound*

yea just for finding a good player in the first round. i’ve never seen a GM get so much praise for being good at one aspect of the job and sucking at basically everything else. it’s like when you’re in arts and crafts in the 4th grade and the whole classroom throws applause at the special kid for being able to make a hand turkey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/13/2019 at 8:42 AM, Jeremy Igo said:

 

Yup, and I've been barking up the draft a TE in the first three rounds the past several drafts.  Andrews, wasn't my top pick, but considering he would be much better than Gaulden, I would have taken him in the 3rd round.  Now Greg can't finish a season healthy, may decide to play one more season, if not retire after this cluster-fugged season and all we have is Ian Thomas.  Well, Manhertz if you want an honorable mention.  That's drafting for sustained success!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Malcom Spence is the best player remaining, hope he’s there.
    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
×
×
  • Create New...