Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

HeyVern! (The Butler Dilemma)


MHS831

Recommended Posts

(This is for the sake of discussion--these views do not really reflect my opinion, but I am trying to see both sides--when I checked out his stats, I was surprised).

Butler has been in on 31 tackles (good  for a DT) and has 6 sacks this season.  For comparison's sake, Gerald McCoy has been in on 19 tackles and has 5 sacks.  Kyle Love has been in on 7 tackles and has zero sacks. (He prolly done).  In fact, the other DT many Huddlers want to see gone in 2020 is Dontari Poe, who (in 11 games) had 22 tackles and 4 sacks--on pace to have his second best season as a pro.

Comparing Butler to the most productive players on the defensive front this year (playing different positions):

Mario Addison: 32 tackles, 9.5 sacks

Bruce Irvin: 35 tackles, 8.5 sacks

Vernon Butler 31 tackles, 6 sacks

Apples and oranges, but the disadvantage goes to the DT here--the fact that his numbers are nearly equal to the team's top edge rushers is noteworthy.

So what do you do with Vern?  Let him sign somewhere and hope for the 3rd round comp pick?  Bring him back?  You may not have liked the punch and the flippage, but you have to admit he was playing with some fire when everyone else seemed checked out.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would offer him something like 3 years, $20 million, with 11 million guaranteed or a 1 year, $8 million deal (comparable to the 5th year option we declined) to prove he's not a flash in the pan if he prefers to bank on proving himself for a bigger payday in 2021. If he wants significantly more, let him test the free agent waters and see if anyone wants to give him more and if they do, let them have him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NYPantherFan said:

Sounds to me he won't be back next year regardless. The only reason he wasn't cut after the Colts game was due to the comp pick formula. Makes me think if that was the reason, they have been planning on walking away.

That is the impression I have been under as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  First, he’s NOT getting a contract that would net us a 3rd round comp pick. That’s about 10M/yr at minimum. Which will not be close to what he gets. 
 

   And the Panthers should definitely pay for the “outlier” sack numbers even though he’s still being driven 5 yards downfield on a regular basis. That will solve the rush defense alone. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Rags said:

If we stick with the 3-4, I'd like to keep him. He can play both Tackle and End. A one-two year deal wouldn't be bad.

Nothing long term though. Could just be preforming in a contract year.

No offense because you did not start this concept, but I think not getting the 5th year was a wake up call for Butler and he played with a chip on his shoulder--and the injury to KK and later Poe gave him the opportunity to develop. 

RR sucked at developing talent--for example, Moton should have played sooner.  Burns?  since he had some veterans that were playing well (Addison and Irvin) do you practically eliminate his reps?  What about Scarlett and Reggie Bonnefon?  Ian Thomas? 

Now many on this board want to bring in a new LT because Little and Daley sucked as rookies.  Please show me the research that suggests recent rookie LTs prosper? Most all suck.  Some want Humphries because he started showing promise during his fourth year---and he was a first rounder.  No--you fix the Center and LG spots and you develop your investment at LT.  We have something to work with, and Huddlers want to bury them on the bench.  Part of coaching is developing the future, not saving your arse each week.  Cam's health is probably due to RR's "live for the moment" mentality.  I am afraid that CMC will have a short career for the same reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  First, he’s NOT getting a contract that would net us a 3rd round comp pick. That’s about 10M/yr at minimum. Which will not be close to what he gets. 
 

   And the Panthers should definitely pay for the “outlier” sack numbers even though he’s still being driven 5 yards downfield on a regular basis. That will solve the rush defense alone. 
 

 

About his contract---if VB's lawyer throws 35 tackles and 7 sacks (after this week, for example) on the table, he could get a bigger deal than you realize.  I agree with you, but you and I are biased.  We paid McCoy $8m and he is not the same player he once was.  KK makes $16m.  I can see a deal in the $7-10m range--don't laugh because I would be furious if we offered it-- All it takes is one team. 

Second point:  I watched him in goal line situations--a 330 lb DT and he was behind Reid and Boston most plays. I would like to know WHERE these 30+ tackles are being made. 

He was given a chance to play, and he did put up numbers--you cannot argue against that.   I have no confidence in him, but if this was his wake up call, he could become a decent DT.  I would hate to have spent 4 years so that some other team reaps the rewards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Second point:  I watched him in goal line situations--a 330 lb DT and he was behind Reid and Boston most plays. I would like to know WHERE these 30+ tackles are being made. 

Are they solo or combined?

Ok looked it up. 31 combined, 22 solo, 9 assist, 7 TFL, 8 QB hit. 3 forced fumbles, 6 sacks.

I assume they all came from up the gut runs where he was single blocked and was able to tackle the RB since 7 were TFL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...