Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ex-Mob Boss Explains How He Extorted Pro Athletes To Throw Games

Shufdog

By Shufdog,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

The NFL Shield At Midfield Grand Master

The NFL Shield At Midfield

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, Shufdog said:

With all of the officiating issues we've had the past few years... does it not make you think?

I mean it has to, right?  The mob is substantially weaker now than it was in the 70s and 80s obviously but they're still involved in bookmaking.  All it takes is one ref or player on the take to mess with the point spread in sports like basketball.  It would be tougher in football considering touches are usually limited to a handful of players on one side of the ball, but it does seem like the flags start popping out if somebody is threatening an upset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Captroop Grand Master

Captroop

Posted
Posted
On 12/31/2019 at 4:07 PM, Shocker said:

Whatta Scumbag

He's just a natural result of the system. There's always gonna be rubes who throw their money away gambling. If you're going around placing bets you can't pay with mob-connected bookies, I'm not gonna say you deserve what you get, but you're certainly a participant in your own downfall.

Frankly I got a lot more issue with some of the scumbags who make their money perfectly legally. Look up the revenue model for mobile game companies some time. It's something like 95% of their revenue comes from like 1% of the gamers. So their objective is to target "whales" who will spend literally tens of thousand of real dollars on friggin loot crates in a mobile game. They're just straight up preying on addicts, many of them minors, while ruining them financially, and it's perfectly legal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
4Corners Grand Master

4Corners

Posted
Posted
On 12/29/2019 at 7:18 PM, Shufdog said:

With all of the officiating issues we've had the past few years... does it not make you think?

To my knowledge, NFL officials must have a primary job or secondary income of over 200k a year. I guess it’s because the NFL doesn’t pay them as much as everyone thinks and they don’t want to hire poor people who may take bribes? LOL. If anything can be learned from American politics, it’s that rich people take bribes too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...