Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers have met with McCarthy twice


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

I think McCarthy was similar to Rivera in GB, and it just was past that team's time, and I think he'd work fine for us for a few years. I wouldn't hate it as much as college coach for the sake of chasing trends (y'all know defenses adapt too, right.)

That said I think Josh McDaniels would be great and the most likely to keep Can on, as well as I think McDaniel's knowledge and Cam's leadership would make an excellent combo in Charlotte.

Rhule is the 2a to McCarthy's 2b, I think he'll want to bring in his own guy but I'd love to see what he can do with Moore and Cmc.

Through all of this, though, really curious as to who our DC would be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Mike McCarthey from 2009-2016 all winning seasons. ALL WINNING SEASONS. I will gladly take 7 straight years of winning seasons and 5 years of playoffs and one super bowl. Unless you guys want to have three years of rebuilding he is our best option. My opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Rags said:

I think McCarthy was similar to Rivera in GB, and it just was past that team's time, and I think he'd work fine for us for a few years. I wouldn't hate it as much as college coach for the sake of chasing trends (y'all know defenses adapt too, right.)

That said I think Josh McDaniels would be great and the most likely to keep Can on, as well as I think McDaniel's knowledge and Cam's leadership would make an excellent combo in Charlotte.

Rhule is the 2a to McCarthy's 2b, I think he'll want to bring in his own guy but I'd love to see what he can do with Moore and Cmc.

Through all of this, though, really curious as to who our DC would be.

I totally agree, though I think more of McCarthey than most in this board, but that DC worries me tremendously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Wolfcop said:

McCarthy is intriguing. He is certainly more of a sure thing than any college coach. 

He had Favre and Roger's his whole time. He had a good front office. We have qbs coming out of a clown car and no one knows what system we run in order to get talent. Sorry, but he had all the advantages there he wont have here. That is a disaster in the making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Very True--and I am a former HS English teacher.  
    • Not a Moore fan-but he had a few good games last year-but I want players that scare you--Renfrow's route running and intelligence, Legette's size, speed, and strength, AT's intelligence and route running, Coker's body control, strong hands, and abilty to win contested catches, and TMac's size, body control, and ability to find soft spots in zone coverages.  Horn gives them the ability to stretch the field and he plays special teams.   Moore has a nice smile and can dance.  He filled in well last season, but to get better as a team, you have to upgrade your players.  I think Moore is a bottom of the roster guy who got bumped when we drafted 2 WRs and signed a legit free agent.  Here is the thing--TMac makes us better because he is great against the zone--man?  Good luck with that.  AT's role can be reduced, and that is probably a good thing.  He can specialize in situational football. Coker?  Just getting started. XL?  Just getting started.  Drafting TMac was probably a bit of a wake up call, but XL will be better as the 2. Renfrow?  I see him splitting reps with AT--keeping both fresh and giving different looks. Horn?  Watch the safety cheat his side when he is in the game--I see a young Steve Smith type in him, but he has yet to play a game.  I hear that Morgan loves him.
    • Burns at 5-6 seems....a little aggressive.
×
×
  • Create New...