Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers have met with McCarthy twice

mc52beast

By mc52beast,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Rags Mentor

Rags

Posted
Posted

I think McCarthy was similar to Rivera in GB, and it just was past that team's time, and I think he'd work fine for us for a few years. I wouldn't hate it as much as college coach for the sake of chasing trends (y'all know defenses adapt too, right.)

That said I think Josh McDaniels would be great and the most likely to keep Can on, as well as I think McDaniel's knowledge and Cam's leadership would make an excellent combo in Charlotte.

Rhule is the 2a to McCarthy's 2b, I think he'll want to bring in his own guy but I'd love to see what he can do with Moore and Cmc.

Through all of this, though, really curious as to who our DC would be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
philit99 Mentor

philit99

Posted
Posted

Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Mike McCarthey from 2009-2016 all winning seasons. ALL WINNING SEASONS. I will gladly take 7 straight years of winning seasons and 5 years of playoffs and one super bowl. Unless you guys want to have three years of rebuilding he is our best option. My opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
philit99 Mentor

philit99

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Rags said:

I think McCarthy was similar to Rivera in GB, and it just was past that team's time, and I think he'd work fine for us for a few years. I wouldn't hate it as much as college coach for the sake of chasing trends (y'all know defenses adapt too, right.)

That said I think Josh McDaniels would be great and the most likely to keep Can on, as well as I think McDaniel's knowledge and Cam's leadership would make an excellent combo in Charlotte.

Rhule is the 2a to McCarthy's 2b, I think he'll want to bring in his own guy but I'd love to see what he can do with Moore and Cmc.

Through all of this, though, really curious as to who our DC would be.

I totally agree, though I think more of McCarthey than most in this board, but that DC worries me tremendously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bobcat91 Proficient

bobcat91

Posted
Posted
Just now, Wolfcop said:

McCarthy is intriguing. He is certainly more of a sure thing than any college coach. 

He had Favre and Roger's his whole time. He had a good front office. We have qbs coming out of a clown car and no one knows what system we run in order to get talent. Sorry, but he had all the advantages there he wont have here. That is a disaster in the making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...