Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Keep Joey Slye?


ForMac

Recommended Posts

What do you think Carolina Huddle? Have we seen enough from a rookie kicker with a huge leg to commit for another season? 

He definitely had a string of chokes and bad kicks earlier in the season. He seems to have stabled out later in the year, but when there's no real pressure, does that matter? 

Graham Gano even if he returns to form is expensive. We also just brought in kicking competition. How highly do you value touchbacks and 50/50ish on game winners? 

My personal opinion is we do another kicking competition. Cut Gano (cap hit/age), even if healthy. Then develope Joey Slye whom is already a touchback expert, and hope he can become as accurate as Gano. At a fraction of the salary and age for a few seasons. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They signed a kicker today to a futures contract, meaning he will be at the 90 person camp.  Elliot Fry.  He's probably the polar opposite of Slye.  He is considered having a "weaker" leg (while still kicking touchbacks and 48 yarders), but being accurate.  He was in the Bears "Kicking Competition", where they started with 10 kickers, and he made it down to 2 remaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something to remember, Slye was asked to kick nearly twice as many 50+ yarders than Gano was ever asked in a single year.  Most 50+ attempts Gano had was 6.  Syle went 8-11.

Slye has 22 kicks from 40+.  Going 16-22.  One single time Gano kicked as many from 40+.  He went 17-23.  With 17 of those in the 40-49 range.

I am not advocating for keeping Slye over Gano.  Only showing that just looking at his total misses isn't the full picture.  This year we put Slye in a horrible position as a kicker.  He was going to miss more than normal just because of the fact as soon as we hit mid field we were apparently in field goal range.  Combined with an offense that regularly sputtered out..it wasn't going to be pretty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Ncpantherfan71 said:

I do not understand some of you.  Y'all say Ganope, but want to keep the kicker who missed more kicks than Gano in his worst year?  

I would like a better kicker, but Sly is not the answer, unless the plan is to suck for a few years and get better draft picks.

Gano's first full 16 game season as a kicker he went 24-35 (68.6%) and missed all 3 of his 50+ yard attempts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MurkN said:

Gano's first full 16 game season as a kicker he went 24-35 (68.6%) and missed all 3 of his 50+ yard attempts.

Ok, you got me, I did not look up to make sure.

My point is still the same, Sly is not the answer.  We are not going to have a good team the next several years, a consistent kicker will be very important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Also, you don't really get good value by drafting a center in the first.
    • First off, we haven't been ignoring the defense. We have drafted several defensive players, but, perhaps more importantly, we have added good pieces in free agency. Secondly, the offense was still kinda bad (27th or so depending where you look at). You can't just say we can't pick an offensive guy while acknowledging that the offense wasn't good. Everything is on the table. Like I said above, it seems kind of counterproductive to say that we shouldn't draft an offensive player high unless they're at certain positions. The offense was mediocre at best. Sure, we had an uncanny knack to win some close games at opportune times, but the offense wasn't really good. To me, it makes little sense to put limitations on who/what we should draft when we need an upgrade at so many positions. What you look at is trying to get the best value--bang for your buck so to speak--and that's the way it should be. D-Mo has used FA to set up the draft in order not to be pigeonholed into anything, and that's the way that it should be.
    • Hubert has plenty of money. I don't hate the guy. I think he a legit good guy. This is Ron Rivera all over again for me. It's just very obvious a coaching change is needed and it audka we gottaboart ways with a good guy and I'd much rather it work out but the same issues appearing again and again year after year are clearly shouting what needs to happen. With that said, if we hire Todd Golden, that's it. I'm out. I'd greatly prefer to just keep getting disappointed by Hubert. I can at least stand to root for that.
×
×
  • Create New...