Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hindsight: We pay Star; let KK walk


Recommended Posts

In this thread, Gettleman cultists, who can find no salvation in whats happening with the Giants, try to take solace that a bust DT, who was named as the 3rd worst free agent signing of the season, helped stop one run in a playoff game

If only we had given Star 50 milion dollar to be one of the poorest graded DTs by PFF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JARROD said:

Star wanted to leave, that was my take. Maybe he loved playing for McDermott or something.

also in hindsight, Buffalo just lost Buffalo style.

not Gangnam style, that’s a Korean Dance.

Buffalo style.

Did you say Buffalo Dance?   There is one:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, (ATL'ien)CamNewton said:

Watching this Bills game ...

Star's value is not quantifiable .. I think had we kept Star, it wouldn't of been hard to find a DT opposite that could do what Short was doing

Star doesn't get pushed backward and that obviously helps everybody else on the line

Finding a DT is much much easier than finding a NT for our ‘3-4’. Should’ve kept star

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Ship said:

I just don’t think Star stays here. He never acted like he liked it or wanted to be here. 

Star's personality is just like that. Pretty sure he didn't hate playing here. He just always has that disgruntled face. I think if you offered him the same contract as buffalo he would have stayed in Carolina. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep, like I said, I don't mind guaranteeing them money, but make the contracts smaller amounts in order to minimize cap implications. I don't know about "half," the actual amounts, whether more or less than half, would have to be determined by the NFL and NFLPA (which will probably be highly contentious, if not "impossible").  I'm just for whatever leads to the best product on the field while also unaffecting my wallet. As an aside, the NFL owners are greedy bastards in my estimation. They're trying to keep a larger portion of the pie, but players' agents are greedy as well, and they've sewn seeds of greed among the players. It's not all their fault; we all know what our society has evolved into, but the NFL wants a bigger piece of our smaller pocketbooks and refuses to "negotiate" with us (that's why we don't have cheaper and more reasonable à la carte options to view games that they're gradually trying to migrate to paid TV), so fu<k 'em. And then on top of that we have guys trying to water down the product even more by feeding greed. Change the way things are done so that we can at least see players prove themselves on the field without throwing wrenches into the engine that pays guys that have proven they can play on a pro level.
    • So if one of the parents wants to buy the theatre group or the band lunch they should get banned?
×
×
  • Create New...