Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

[Schefter] Panthers Give Matt Rhule SEVEN Year Deal Worth $60m to $70m


bobsfoodbasics

Recommended Posts

The more I think about this, this was a smart move by ownership.  I don't care what anyone says, Rhule is definitely a "college coach" and he's going to need the best assistants he can get while he adapts to the NFL game.  How many people want to move their family for some college coach they don't even know, and have no idea if that guy is even going to be around in 2 years or simply ran out of the league?  Enter the huge contract.  Now he has the ability to make a play for some of the better names in the business, and be able to say "we have stability at the top, and we are going to allow you to build something here."  Considering its not money that effects the cap, I like it as a strategy on top of everything else.

It also sends the message to the players as well.  Don't blow this guy off (hehe), he's here longer than you are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Hang on, there is likely going to be massive turnover and a few fan favorites traded within the next few years.

I've mentioned this before, but you can rebuild while winning some games....mind you, it's a fairly stupid way to do it, but it can be done.

If we were truly going to start from scratch, Cam and Luke are likely gone this offseason, Cam certainly.  We will see what Tep wants to try to accomplish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
    • I parked in this lot a few times. It would take over and hour to get out of that lot after games. Never again
×
×
  • Create New...