Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone else fed up with our current ESPN beat writer?


emcannon

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, SBiii said:

What's wrong with him?

Hmm where to begin? He’s a hack who pushes certain narratives for clicks either (a) knowing they’re completely false, or (b) is just too stupid to be any good at his job. He literally posted an article hours before Rhule was hired pushing a “McDaniels is gonna bring Tom Brady with him to Carolina” narrative. And regardless of your feelings on Cam, he has a very obvious bias against him & pushes stories out that are shaded against QB1 allllll the time.

His articles are almost always riddled with grammatical errors and often inaccurate & he never owns his mistakes. He’ll tweet crap out and never correct the record or respond to people on Twitter. 
 

In short, he’s terrible at his job and needs to be replaced.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

He sucks, but removing him won’t help anything. We had Pat Yasinskas before him and he was equally terrible. 

I actually preferred Pat Y. Plus, wasn’t he beat writer for the entire NFC South? That was before ESPN hired writers for each team, I believe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, emcannon said:

Hmm where to begin? He’s a hack who pushes certain narratives for clicks either (a) knowing they’re completely false, or (b) is just too stupid to be any good at his job. He literally posted an article hours before Rhule was hired pushing a “McDaniels is gonna bring Tom Brady with him to Carolina” narrative. And regardless of your feelings on Cam, he has a very obvious bias against him & pushes stories out that are shaded against QB1 allllll the time.

His articles are almost always riddled with grammatical errors and often inaccurate & he never owns his mistakes. He’ll tweet crap out and never correct the record or respond to people on Twitter. 
 

In short, he’s terrible at his job and needs to be replaced.  

Question, have you closely followed any other ESPN beat reporters to judge Newton’s performance against theirs? Not to defend Bewton because I have no strong opinion on him either way, but some of the things you complain about sound like things very common to all journalism right now. Click baiting and pushing certain narratives may or may not be directives from higher up the food chain.

just sayin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Question, have you closely followed any other ESPN beat reporters to judge Newton’s performance against theirs? Not to defend Bewton because I have no strong opinion on him either way, but some of the things you complain about sound like things very common to all journalism right now. Click baiting and pushing certain narratives may or may not be directives from higher up the food chain.

just sayin.

Ain’t nobody got time for that. If other writers are horrible, let those fans try and get them replaced. I mean it’s pretty common knowledge the players hate him too & they generally get along well with members of the media. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, emcannon said:

Hmm where to begin? He’s a hack who pushes certain narratives for clicks either (a) knowing they’re completely false, or (b) is just too stupid to be any good at his job. He literally posted an article hours before Rhule was hired pushing a “McDaniels is gonna bring Tom Brady with him to Carolina” narrative. And regardless of your feelings on Cam, he has a very obvious bias against him & pushes stories out that are shaded against QB1 allllll the time.

His articles are almost always riddled with grammatical errors and often inaccurate & he never owns his mistakes. He’ll tweet crap out and never correct the record or respond to people on Twitter. 
 

In short, he’s terrible at his job and needs to be replaced.  

Here's a thought!  Don't read his articles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
    • He is a talented player with a lot of potential but ultimately he is a legend in his own mind and the minds of those who attack on his behalf when people pinpoint inconvenient truths. I could see people being so hostile over him if he actually had that kind of juice but he doesn't. Even in the Heat win LaMelo took 31 shots and was 40%. If not for Coby White's late heroics we would have lost in regulation. The reality is we do have pieces in place to compete in the playoffs but in year 6 and with a supermax and a salary that is only going to increase over the next few years LaMelo Ball simply does not look like a franchise centerpiece that you can go on multiple playoff runs with. Look at someone like Trae Young. His team moved on. And he actually took them to the conference finals. The Hornets are at a crossroads. Very tough conversations need to be had in the offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...