Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stadium Talk


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Basically, the Panthers talking down the value of BOA for tax purposes.

I suppose there could be other reasons for this but I can't imagine what they might be. It's not like they're trying to lay the groundwork for anything, right? :thinking:

I would agree if it were just the stadium but TONS of people got screwed over with Meck county’s last tax evaluation. Heck I’m even appealing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Panthercougar68 said:

I would agree if it were just the stadium but TONS of people got screwed over with Meck county’s last tax evaluation. Heck I’m even appealing.

Fair enough.

I do think it's possible that the Panthers might have some...ulterior motives here, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the Chiefs, in a smaller, colder, older, more decrepit city (in a much smaller two state region), can draft Kareem Hunt and Tyreek Hill, and trade for Frank Clark, AND play in a stadium built in 1972, AND be the Super Bowl favorite, and NOT need a new stadium.

And the Panthers need a new stadium, despite having one 24 years younger than Arrowhead, despite force feeding the masses GARBAGE football after allowing their franchise DE to not only be stolen away, but spat on on his way out?

Wow.

1EEE1C88-48F6-4F47-872F-CC6BBA74CE9D.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Nails said:

So the Chiefs, in a smaller, colder, older, more decrepit city (in a much smaller two state region), can Draft Kareem Hunt and Tyreek Hill, and trade for Frank Clark, AND play in a stadium built in 1972, AND be the Super Bowl favorite, and NOT need a new stadium.

And the Panthers need a new stadium, despite having one 24 years younger than Arrowhead, despite force feeding the masses GARBAGE football after allowing their franchise DE to not only be stolen away, but spat on on his way out?

Wow.

1EEE1C88-48F6-4F47-872F-CC6BBA74CE9D.gif

Did you know this thread was about property taxes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Tell you what Tepper....give me a month to gather some folks, and I'll gladly buy that stadium off of you for your proposed value, plus....let's say 3%?

$89,919,000.00, out the door.

Deal?

Sure, but you only get the stadium. You don’t get the team or the land it sits on. Just a building that can only be used for one thing. 
 

Congrats, you now own the sports equivalent of Eastland mall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...