Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC Trade Talk (Might as well get it out there)


saX man

Recommended Posts

Heyo!

This grew out of another thread about Cam so want to hone in on this discussion of Christian.  To summarize what was previously discussed:

In the event Cam Newton is traded, which looks like a complete possibility, many have drawn out the scenario of shipping CMC while he is at max value. 

Factors mentioned included the career expectancy of RBs and not risking the value he has now on a rebuilding team if he gets injured or whatnot.  In addition, we'll have to pay him soon with a pretty major deal in an age where that type of money is not allocated to running backs (Even considering he's a dual threat).  I'm not entirely on the trade CMC fence if we do ship Cam but do agree there is a conversation to be had here.  

Currently, the average starting RB in the NFL makes $12 million/year.  He is 23 years old, the age of some older rookies, has played 2 full workload seasons, and is really both a receiver and running back.  Top-10 Player in the league right now?  Easily if we're just looking on the offensive side, so his value is incredible at the moment, especially being a dual threat player. 

For reference, Zeke Elliott is on a 6 yr/$90 mil package (which I think the Cowboys will/may already regret)...we're probably looking at something in that range.  Something also to note is that CMC hasn't eclipsed 300 carries in a season.  LT carried and received at CMC's capacity (arguably a bit more) for 8 legit seasons and I think both are similar in respect to durability.   

What do you think?  Is it worth exploring?  Is he a piece you think we should shape the team around or is he more expendable than is let on?  What would you target in this scenario giving away such a large % of our offensive production?    

--

Saxy PSA: Now let's play nice.  I am simply posing the narrative to generate discussion.  This turned heated elsewhere but I would hope for a fun discussion without people just providing hot takes on the fan base, message board, or general life complaints about their sausage or pie at home. (Edit: I knew the poo was coming haha, had to do it folks! I love you all)

I bid thee adieu. Happy longest Month of the offseason.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if you trade Cam there is really very little reason to keep CMC around. That is JMO and I love CMC as a player but the franchise appears to be headed in the direction of tearing it all down, so I just don't see why you would want to build around a "highest paid RB in the NFL" type of contract. The recent history of the teams that shelled out top 5 money to RB's has not been very good. It's just such a small window for the typical elite RB in the NFL. There are very, very, very, very few guys that make 10+ year careers as elite RB's in the NFL. 

If there was some fantasy world where we could bring back CMC for a 4-5 year contract between $8-11 mil, I'd be fine with that. But if he is going to command a $15+ mil year contract, I just cannot see the justification for tying up that kind of money in a player that has such a limited average shelf life.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you wanna go this route, it should be understood as a purely theoretical discussion.

In reality there is zero indication, or even speculation for that matter, that the Panthers have given a single thought in this direction.

There has, however, been discussion of a possible extension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Narrative created by those who are so infatuated with Cam and only deal in absolutes in regards to his status with the team. CMC isn’t going anywhere and even if there was a possibility of this happening you’d have to imagine this franchise without a face. No Cam, no Greg, no Kuech, and no CMC?

 

Poorest of the poor marketing strategies. It ain’t happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AggieLean said:

If #1 is gone, then we might as well see what we can get for CMC. We’re a 5 win team with him leading, and with RBs aging horribly, if we can get a 1st then you pull the trigger 

My question is if he has high trade value at all. The reason being, a team will know that they can just try and open market bid for him after this coming season. I don't see any scenario where a "sign and trade" happens because the instant we shell out a $13+ mil contract, it is going to be one that most teams are not willing to touch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

My question is if he has high trade value at all. The reason being, a team will know that they can just try and open market bid for him after this coming season. I don't see any scenario where a "sign and trade" happens because the instant we shell out a $13+ mil contract, it is going to be one that most teams are not willing to touch.

Honestly, if the team is serious about rebuilding, I’d unload him for a couple 2nds from teams with high picks.

Sucks it’s come to this, but extending CMC doesn’t seem smart at all; especially since he will be the highest paid RB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nosuchthingasapanther said:

a player like mccaffery is a rookie qb's best friend and crucial to his success.

he isn't going anywhere.

maybe the new coaches will do a better job but i don't think throwing the ball to a running back 10 times a game is really helping a quarterback develop. good offensive linemen would be better for a rookie quarterback. trade mccaffrey for picks and go all in on the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, nosuchthingasapanther said:

a player like mccaffery is a rookie qb's best friend and crucial to his success.

he isn't going anywhere.

Sounds good. So who is this rookie QB, and when are we getting him? If it isn't happening within the next 24 months there is absolutely no reason to hand a record contract to a running back this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • He gets the blame because his role as the QB is to make plays, help the team score more points and elevate players around him. He does none of that. Just because he didn’t massively mess up doesn’t mean he wasn’t a reason for the loss. The bar some of you have for Bryce is incredibly low.
    • Yeah I was crying about this earlier in the year when we got to 6 wins. Equal number to Wilks.  We are still a QB away. 
    • Hey y'all, a topic that has been on my mind has always been the parallels between two of the best quarterbacks in the history of the NFC South and ultimately their place in history and how they are viewed moving forward through the rest of NFL history. These two quarterbacks as you might have guessed are their respective franchises greatest signal callers, Cam Newton and Matt Ryan.  Cam Newton (144 Games Started): 269 TDs (1.8 per contest), 123 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Matt Ryan (234 Games Starter):  394 TDs (1.6 per contest), 183 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Obviously on first glance, these are very similar players with identical top accomplishments. Let's zoom in a little bit on their surrounding talent. C Cam Newton top offensive producers:  Greg Olsen (TE) (9 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls) Steve Smith Sr. (WR) (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl) Matt Ryan top offensive producers:  Julio Jones (WR) (10 Seasons) (7 Pro Bowls)  Roddy White (WR) (8 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Tony Gonzalez (TE) (5 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Wow, quite the difference here. Through Cam's career his top option was Greg Olsen, who was one of the best tight ends of his generation and a real difference maker in an offense reliant on their quarterback making plays outside of structure. Newton post Steve Smith Sr was saddled with a revolving door of Chicken McNobodies at the receiver position and the offense had to be funneled through the tight end and running attack as Jericho Cotchery, Corey Brown, Jason Avant, Kelvin Benjamin, etc was not getting the job done. Ryan on the other hand was consistently surrounded with top level offensive weapons, including one of the best receivers and tight ends in the history of the game, thanks in part to an aggressive general manager who wanted to ensure they could maximize the arm talent of their franchise quarterback.  How about protection?  Cam Newton top offensive lineman: Jordan Gross (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Ryan Kalil (8 Seasons) (2 Pro Bowls) Andrew Norwell (4 Seasons)  Trai Turner (6 Seasons) (5 Pro Bowls) Matt Ryan top offensive lineman:  Jake Matthews (8 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Alex Mack (5 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls)  Andy Levitre (3 Seasons)  Todd McLure (5 Seasons)  While Matt Ryan certainly had more consistency and high level talent on his offensive line, one could argue they had similar protection through the bulk of their career. Though one has to acknowledge some of the absolute dog water lineman that were trot out to protect Newton at his tackle spots post Jordan Gross retirement. Byron Bell, Mike Remmers, Matt Kalil, Chris Clark, Amini Silatolu, Nate Chandler, etc were all a collective pile of garbage save for two seasons from Remmers and a few splashes of brilliance from Michael Oher, Daryl Williams, and early career Taylor Moton.  Defense should be fairly simple.  Cam Newton defense average rank:  17th/32 Matt Ryan defense average rank:  18th/32  Honestly I was a bit surprised by this, I had thought Cam consistently had the better defenses, but when you look at the average it's shockingly close. While Newton did have the higher peaks of defense, Atlanta placed higher more consistently and only really faltered towards the end of Ryan's career. Both these players had on and off again defenses to rely on.  So what does all this mean?  1. I am bored at work  2. Cam Newton has the better body of work given the talent around him  While I am not sure either is necessarily a lock to get a gold jacket, it's undeniable that Newton carried his franchise on his back for the better part of his career and changed how quarterbacks are viewed as a whole. Newton became the blueprint for a new breed of signal caller, and Ryan is the standard that is set for pocket quarterbacks in the modern league. Both players deserve their kudos for what they did for their franchises and how they morphed their team's identity, but Newton I think was clearly the better of the NFC South quarterbacks, especially if he had remained as healthy as Ryan did. 
×
×
  • Create New...