Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina sticking with Cam


WoahW

Recommended Posts

This is just them trying to drum up trade interest

 

WFNZ talking about it now.  Said their sources down the street have told them the Panthers have recieved 0 phone calls and 0 teams have shown any interest despite what some other rumors that have been circulating 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WoahW said:

Nowhere does it say that it says when he’ll be game ready is later than what most teams would like but for a former MVP that means nothing 

“A timeline that complicates any potential trade.”

Which means the panthers have actively been fielding trade talks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

“A timeline that complicates any potential trade.”

Which means the panthers have actively been fielding trade talks.

Either your reading comprehension sucks or your reading comprehension sucks. 

It doesnt say that.it says that trade offers would come too late. And that was Rapaport speculating not a report of anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, WoahW said:

It’s almost like these insiders have no clue what’s happening behind closed doors like a few of us has been saying. Common sense would say if you get a King’s ransom you trade him but if not you keep him and see what he can do 

Actually, our own inside source had already said this several days ago in All Pro, but also added "for now" and that the situation is still fluid.

21 minutes ago, joeyxfresco said:

Still can’t trust whatever Rap says after his “sources” were off all year 

The usual standard employed here is the sources are trustworthy as long as they are saying what you want to hear.

It's not uncommon to see the same people call a source reliable or lousy depending on what they're saying. It's dumb, but it happens a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

Either your reading comprehension sucks or your reading comprehension sucks. 

It doesnt say that.it says that trade offers would come too late. And that was Rapaport speculating not a report of anything.

It literally says “a timeline that complicates any potential trade”. Not “a timeline that would complicate any potential trade”. Indicating we have been at least pushing/fielding some feelers. Compound that with Cam being up for a big contract next year as well as not knowing if he will perform well.

I’m in the keep Cam here at least this year camp. It’s important to note Hurney and Tepper definitely tested the waters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
    • Sorry, but this is a terrible breakdown that doesn't at all show what you're trying to say/project about T-Mac next year, as it leaves out key information that changes everything, it makes the opposite point that you're trying to. Chase missed 5 games that second season after playing all 17 as a rookie (and still saw more targets that second season). Puka it looks like you projected his stats out to a 17 game season (as he only played 11 games), but even still , when you have 160+ targets as a rookie, there isn't really much room to get any more the next year. Waddle saw an increase in yards, and sure, his targets went down, but he played on a team with a better WR that year who saw 170 targets for 1,710 yards during that 2nd season for Waddle... something T-Mac doesn't have to contend with on the same team (280+ targets for their top 2 WRs, if you don't think T-Mac would see more than 122 targets if him and Coker combined for 287, then you're nuts). Then Olave and Wilson both saw an increase of 19 targets in their second season. You basically just laid out the reasoning for why T-Mac should see at least 20 more targets next year, if not more, which would be a solid increase and put him easily into the Top 10 most targeted WR next season.
×
×
  • Create New...