Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could this guy be the next Panther starting MLB?


MHS831

Recommended Posts

#59 (ironically) out of California.  Supposedly had a solid mentor last year.  Maybe he is worth a look:

Sometimes, the answer is on your own roster. 

 

Here is my take:  Probably better in a 3-4, but this guy plays down hill.  Had a 4.82 40 time at his pro day, which probably kept him out of the draft.  However, his reads are quick and he does not false step.  Maybe he is only depth and special teams, but maybe--just maybe---he can rise above the criticism.

If playing Jordan at MLB keeps Shaq at his natural position, then that is a bonus as well.  Could Luke's replacement be #59 from Cal---and already on the roster? Vontaze Burfict has been decent (a head case, but a head hunter as well) and his 40 time was 5.09--slower than some OL and DTs.

Hmmmm.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as I love Luke, I’m not at all in favor of drafting his replacement high because I believe positional value in the modern era with a heavy emphasis on passing is low, therefore I’m completely in favor of looking at guys like this later down the line. I wish people would stop acting like because Kuechley was all world, it’s imperative his replacement be a day one pick. It’s not. Mike just isn’t as important a position as it once was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

As much as I love Luke, I’m not at all in favor of drafting his replacement high because I believe positional value in the modern era with a heavy emphasis on passing is low, therefore I’m completely in favor of looking at guys like this later down the line. I wish people would stop acting like because Kuechley was all world, it’s imperative his replacement be a day one pick. It’s not. Mike just isn’t as important a position as it once was.

You say that.. but then you just had to best linebacker in the league as the leader of the defense for nearly a decade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

As much as I love Luke, I’m not at all in favor of drafting his replacement high because I believe positional value in the modern era with a heavy emphasis on passing is low, therefore I’m completely in favor of looking at guys like this later down the line. I wish people would stop acting like because Kuechley was all world, it’s imperative his replacement be a day one pick. It’s not. Mike just isn’t as important a position as it once was.

Yeah Luke Spoiled us but he could only do so much on any given play. We will miss having a second defensive coordinator no doubt but the trenches are far more important to address at the moment than the second line of defense. A good D line can make an average LBer look above average to great, same with the secondary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has as good a shot as anyone.  With so many needs along our O and D lines, with the money we paid Shaq . . . I can't see us investing at LB before the fourth.  I'm sure we'll draft a LB, but I don't think it will be a high pick and thus JK will get the opportunity to compete. 

May the best player win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, steven8989 said:

Season 6 Bip GIF by Bachelor in Paradise

So you think it is crazy to give this guy a look? At least you provide concrete, football-related reasons for your expert analysis of his ability. If we are going OL, DT, CB, WR, etc. in the draft, where do you think the MLB is going to come from?  If you say free agency, then pick a guy who would be worth the price and is actually better than this guy--a guy who fits into the system/plans.  I watched him in pre season and was impressed--and I provide my reasons.  What are your reasons for not giving him a shot? What is your plan for meeting needs and putting a stud MLB on the field?   I'll wait for your in-depth response meme.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, BrianS said:

He has as good a shot as anyone.  With so many needs along our O and D lines, with the money we paid Shaq . . . I can't see us investing at LB before the fourth.  I'm sure we'll draft a LB, but I don't think it will be a high pick and thus JK will get the opportunity to compete. 

May the best player win.

Thanks.  We have to be realistic--every need is not going to be met with a first-round pick.  If we go OT, DT, DT, CB, WR, S, G, C, DE, etc. in free agency and the draft---the Lukes and Bobby Wagners are probably going to be gone.  If we bring in some stud DTs, then a high-motor, underrrated, smart MLB might be good enough. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luke became a generational player.  He had a great athletic profile and was an absolutely prolific player at BC.  In the interviews he came across as a total film junkie.  Those traits made Luke a pretty safe pick along with a fair dose of luck.

Will we find our next Luke?  Probably not.  It's just the math and odds.  Could we already have a guy who could play there at a high level?  Maybe, and that would be great.

But no matter how good a LB is, without a stout DL, they are going to have some real problems.  We saw that with Luke.  When the DL failed, OL were able to get their hands on him, which meant he couldn't do his normal running to where he knows the play is going.

My hope is that Luke can continue to help out in some capacity with our young guys, teach them how to breakdown film, and we end up finding a player who is smart enough to do something with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Yeah Luke Spoiled us but he could only do so much on any given play. We will miss having a second defensive coordinator no doubt but the trenches are far more important to address at the moment than the second line of defense. A good D line can make an average LBer look above average to great, same with the secondary. 

Since we are probably not going to find Luke's replacement, draft  or sign 2 DTs, a DE, CB, S, WR, TE, G, OT, C, etc.  this year, you need to build from the middle out, front to back for this reason.  Jordan would be worth a look to man the MLB duties if we get some good DTs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

Doubt it

That is the point--he has been doubted his entire career-and proven even the most articulate and in-depth experts wrong.  You are not alone--which is the reason for the thread.  He might fill a need during the rebuild---and giving him a shot is the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

So you think it is crazy to give this guy a look? At least you provide concrete, football-related reasons for your expert analysis of his ability. If we are going OL, DT, CB, WR, etc. in the draft, where do you think the MLB is going to come from?  If you say free agency, then pick a guy who would be worth the price and is actually better than this guy--a guy who fits into the system/plans.  I watched him in pre season and was impressed--and I provide my reasons.  What are your reasons for not giving him a shot? What is your plan for meeting needs and putting a stud MLB on the field?   I'll wait for your in-depth response meme.  

Shaq Thompson Water GIF by Carolina Panthers

We just paid this guy is that enough for u?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...