Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Team hosting DE Chris Smith (Update: SIGNED 1 year deal)


Untouchable

Recommended Posts

His length and versatility make sense.

EDIT:  I'll add this because I'm trying to get a sense of the players the staff likes, his athletic profile from the 2014 draft is below.  Better athlete than 76% of players in NFL.

Height 6010
Weight 266
Arms 34.125
Hands 9.5
Wing 83.125
40 yd 4.66
10 yd 1.66
Shuttle 4.46
3 Cone 7.37
BP 28
Vertical 37
Broad 10.08

_____________________________________

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

His length? He's 6'1". 8.5 career sacks over the course of six seasons. Looks like camp fodder with a chance to maybe get a roster spot.

I expect we will see a lot of these types of guys. Give them a chance but also easy to move on from. We need a ton of them this year if we aren't throwing stupid money around in free agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

His length? He's 6'1". 8.5 career sacks over the course of six seasons. Looks like camp fodder with a chance to maybe get a roster spot.

34-1/8" arms @ 6'1" is great length yes.  And yes, he shouldn't be viewed as anything but potentially a depth piece.

EDIT:  83-1/8" wingspan too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Waldo said:

I expect we will see a lot of these types of guys. Give them a chance but also easy to move on from. We need a ton of them this year if we aren't throwing stupid money around in free agency.

Yep. At the end of the day, we gotta field a roster somehow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yep. At the end of the day, we gotta field a roster somehow.

Well if this was the plan we should still have alot of the AFL players numbers.. So we can atleast field a expansion team..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Waldo said:

I expect we will see a lot of these types of guys. Give them a chance but also easy to move on from. We need a ton of them this year if we aren't throwing stupid money around in free agency.

In fairness, Charles Johnson was 6-2, but anyone can find an exception to a rule. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I hope he finds his lane in year 2.  Now that we signed Walker, I'm really intrigued how Dan feels about the DL. Is there a piece there in R1 that presents value/BPA and fills a void for one of the spots w/ DB and Wharton.  I'll give Wharton another year to show us why he was signed here. With A'Shawn gone, I don't think BBIII is it.  Our edges are set and our LBs are balanced. Horn/Mike Jack and Moehrig will hold the secondary together. DB is, well...DB.  However, I think this is an area that is the biggest question mark right now. I see 1 of 3 spots that are locked and loaded for us. If we move to a 4 down front, I assume Phillips would slide down to be the additional linemen, but we still have questions about the other two spots in either scheme.  I'd feel better with a tradeback, but I do wonder how McDonald would do here. Maybe Woods....but McDonald really does peek my interest.  Or, can Jackson take that next step. The coaching staff speaks highly of him for what little he played. Here's hoping he stays healthy and comes into TC with something to prove. There's a spot to be taken, here's hoping he takes it.
    • Not many people talking about DT, but we have a need.  (DE)  Now this guy is a NT like Brown III
×
×
  • Create New...