Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

Everyone and every scientist said there would be a "2nd" "3rd" "4th" etc wave...... so now everyone but the USA has defeated convid and didnt even have the "2nd" wave??

Again if you dont test, no one has it... I mean North Korea had NO cases or deaths, simply AMAZING!!   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

DeSantis was being attacked saying his state was going to be New York.  It's not New York, and they have a long ways to go to get there.  If Florida becomes New York, he was wrong.  If it doesn't, while we have our opinions, he was not really wrong.

I guess technically you're right at this exact moment. But if Florida ends up with the 2nd most deaths in the country when all is said and done (which is looking like a distinct possibility), the take away is "Gotta hand it to De Santis. He was right!" I would also suggest better criteria for becoming the next New York would be overwhelming their hospitals' capacity to take care of COVID patients rather than having the exact number of deaths, which controls for things like improvements in care, as well as differences in health disparaties and population density. They are pretty much there, if not will be soon at this rate, with a large number of ICUs there at capacity and hospitalizations only rising (or I mean we can only presume with Florida suspiciously cagey with their data). 

Regardless of specific outcomes, he already looks like a fool to me. At this point its just how bad will it get. But I'd be happy to revisit this thread in 3 months.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not sure when you last looked at a map, but there's a helluva lot more water between us and China than Japan and China. Mexico and Canada probably wish there was an ocean between us and them right now.

You need this for your soul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Peon Awesome said:

Regardless of specific outcomes, he already looks like a fool to me. At this point its just how bad will it get. But I'd be happy to revisit this thread in 3 months.

Why did you waste all of those words before this statement when you could have just cut to the chase.  You don't care what actually happens, you don't like him either way.  Shocker!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kass said:

Have there been an increase in ICU units? Can they increase it?

In Sweden we had about 526 ICU before the pandemic. During the pandemic it was increased to 1000-1100. Lowest number of free capacity was around 18% (from my memory). ICU in Sweden = always ventilators + personnel to man the unit. Otherwise the patient falls under "hospitalization".

you have to understand that the american healthcare system is run like any other business; there's no room to expand, there's no room for excess. excess is something that isn't making you money. it's why you're seeing things like in houston where you're hospitals are expanding into children's hospitals

so don't look at it like "once we reach x% then the poo hits the fan." think of it as "the closer we get to x% the less effective we are at treating it." 

without massive federal intervention (that's not coming) there's only so much upward scaling you can do in such a short amount of time. 

anything can be an icu bed. I can slap a 25 year old heart monitor on a bed in the hall and call it an icu bed. But do I have the staff to man it? Do i have the equipment? can i do everything i need to do if thigns go pear shaped? 

And sweden is an irrelevant comparison. think about how much healthier an average swede is at baseline than an american because they have better healthcare throughout their lives. think about how much better functioning their healthcare system is than the american one. 

if nothing else this should really give far right wingers good reason to reevaluate their views irt healthcare but lmao we know it won't

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mandatory masks should be N95 or better. Roy Cooper is totally OK with knitted masks and surgical masks that give folks a false sense of security.

Either mandate masks that REALLY work or stop the political foolishness.

He may be embarrassed for running the president out of town, deservedly so, you look like a puppet, but we shouldn't all be covering our faces for his own shame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rippadonn said:

Mandatory masks should be N95 or better. Roy Cooper is totally OK with knitted masks and surgical masks that give folks a false sense of security.

Either mandate masks that REALLY work or stop the political foolishness.

He may be embarrassed for running the president out of town, deservedly so, you look like a puppet, but we shouldn't all be covering our faces for his own shame.

They do work as long as the vast majority of people actually wear them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Wow, a new low point in this thread. 
 

Mocking a global pandemic with Samurai humor? 

Silly

Asian folks have been wearing masks for years.  Airports are full of people with masks on well before this virus and 99% were Asian.

I was in Japanese airport last year, tons of masks, no pandemic.  They are just ahead of the curve, better safe than sorry

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Mandatory masks should be N95 or better. Roy Cooper is totally OK with knitted masks and surgical masks that give folks a false sense of security.

Either mandate masks that REALLY work or stop the political foolishness.

He may be embarrassed for running the president out of town, deservedly so, you look like a puppet, but we shouldn't all be covering our faces for his own shame.

is there a thread on this forum where someone isn't laughed out of the website for a post this stupid?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

They do work as long as the vast majority of people actually wear them.

Surgical masks are for bacteria and spit NOT a virus. False sense of security. Also increasing peoples daily CO2 which will make their immune system weaker. Sick people should not be gassing themselves for ANY reason. People with high blood pressure should NOT be wearing masks for any extended period. If you've had the flu shot you are recirculating covid as well as other flu shot goodies in your mask daily, which could lead to SARS.

Masks violate OSHA but nothing to see here.

YOU are responsible for your own health, nobody else cares, they only profit from ignorance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I enjoy being truthful. Although that means being unbiased. Which most on here are incapable of being unbiased. 
    • It looks like the Bucks and Giannis are headed for a divorce. He says he's ready to play and the Bucks say that he has told them he isn't. It really doesn't matter except that it likely means the end for Giannis in Milwaukee. He's 31 years old, but still an elite producer.  So, as GM, would you go after him this offseason? Remember, the Hornets have two 1st round picks this year and potentially THREE first round picks next year. What would a trade look like?
    • I agree with you, if all things are equal--assuming we are on the same page as to what that means.  If a DT and OT are there at 19 and you have them equal, which do you take? The DT would be rotational and get 25 snaps a game or so, and the OT is probably a reserve for most of the season.  What if Walker plays out of his mind and Ickey comes back strong? To me, there are just too many variables at T and Morgan met the needs for 2 starters.  Nothing about that screams lets "go OT in round 1" to me. I could see an Edge or a DT at 19 before I see OT.  I could see a TE or S before an OT--and I (personally) would rather have an OT over DT, Edge, TE, or S--but I do not see the logic.  In fact, CB is a position that resembles OT--who do we have behind our starters and are we happy with Smith-Wade?  A CB would be on the field more than a reserve OT.  How is the Walker at LT situation different than the the Bryce situation? He is basically on a 1-year deal and if he is injured, Forsythe becomes Pickett.  Would you take Simpson in the draft?  Dont get me wrong--I usually agree with you  and I get your point.  I am an OL guru--but I just do not see this particular group of Tackles making us better than Walker.  In addition, I think we can address OT once the Ickey situation clears up.  Short arms, poor run blocking, issues with strength--I am simply not impressed with the OTs.  For clarity, "developmental" refers to players who are still a year or two away from starting.  We are all developmental, but there are prospects who need a season to transition to the pro game. I see 1--maybe 2 OTs who could step into a starting role right now. In college, for example, taking snaps under center requires a different approach than blocking for the shotgun.  There is less to learn if you play a position that does not require much adjustment to transition to the NFL.
×
×
  • Create New...