Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

Great, let's open everything up immediately and go back to life as normal...but wearing masks.  Clearly its like wearing a hazmat suit.

Not normal. Modified normals. Some restrictions still make sense.

Look, Hong Kong has now gone 14 days without a single case of local transmission. This is a place with a much high population density than NYC. They did that without resorting to a full stay at home lockdown. 
 

If wearing masks (along with other reasonable measures) means no more lockdowns and saving the economy, isn’t it worth it?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.usnews.com/news/cities/articles/2020-04-22/how-hong-kong-flattened-the-curve-without-total-lockdown%3fcontext=amp

 

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/05/asia/hong-kong-coronavirus-recovery-intl-hnk/index.html

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, GOAT said:

can't believe everything you read.

the media has gone mad with stories on this whole thing.

also, it's a positive development from the CDC.

Um, I believe a person who is sick and a doctor pointing out where she got it from. Reading comprehension difficult for you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Tbe said:

Not normal. Modified normals. Some restrictions still make sense.

Look, Hong Kong has now gone 14 days without a single case of local transmission. This is a place with a much high population density than NYC. They did that without resorting to a full stay at home lockdown. 
 

If wearing masks (along with other reasonable measures) means no more lockdowns and saving the economy, isn’t it worth it?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.usnews.com/news/cities/articles/2020-04-22/how-hong-kong-flattened-the-curve-without-total-lockdown%3fcontext=amp

 

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/05/asia/hong-kong-coronavirus-recovery-intl-hnk/index.html

Hong Kong is not a reliable source of data.  Back when they had hundreds if not thousands of cases they were reporting 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Wes21 said:

Hong Kong is not a reliable source of data.  Back when they had hundreds if not thousands of cases they were reporting 3.

Singapore has seen similar results.

Masks are not a cure, but all evidence points to the fact that they help. Some studies show they help significantly. Show me a credible study that says they do absolutely nothing, and I’ll be with you.

https://theconversation.com/masks-help-stop-the-spread-of-coronavirus-the-science-is-simple-and-im-one-of-100-experts-urging-governors-to-require-public-mask-wearing-138507

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watching people fight against wearing masks during a global pandemic has to be the weirdest thing I've ever seen.

I remember that movie Contagion a few years back with Matt Damon, thinking that it was a very realistic depiction of a pandemic. If it had a bunch of people running around in public saying "Whatever, I'm not wearing a mask! Don't tell me what to do!" I would have thought that it was stupid as hell. Too unbelievable, something like that would never happen.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tbe said:

Singapore has seen similar results.

Masks are not a cure, but all evidence points to the fact that they help. Some studies show they help significantly. Show me a credible study that says they do absolutely nothing, and I’ll be with you.

https://theconversation.com/masks-help-stop-the-spread-of-coronavirus-the-science-is-simple-and-im-one-of-100-experts-urging-governors-to-require-public-mask-wearing-138507

I never said masks do nothing.  I'm saying some people are completely overestimating what a mask...or more accurately here in America a "face covering," is actually doing.

Your post is what's wrong with this situation.  People want to be all or nothing on everything.  If I don't fully agree with you, it means I'm totally against it?  Its hogwash.  I wear a mask, but I'm also not trying to pretend its doing more than it actually is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tbe said:

Singapore has seen similar results.

Masks are not a cure, but all evidence points to the fact that they help. Some studies show they help significantly. Show me a credible study that says they do absolutely nothing, and I’ll be with you.

https://theconversation.com/masks-help-stop-the-spread-of-coronavirus-the-science-is-simple-and-im-one-of-100-experts-urging-governors-to-require-public-mask-wearing-138507

The top expert in South Korea says the same thing, significant reduction in transmission. I'd listen to them before anyone else.

But I don't think there's any number of studies, facts or evidence that will matter to some of these people. They've made up their minds that "masks bad" and there's no convincing them otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

Watching people fight against wearing masks during a global pandemic has to be the weirdest thing I've ever seen.

I remember that movie Contagion a few years back with Matt Damon, thinking that it was a very realistic depiction of a pandemic. If it had a bunch of people running around in public saying "Whatever, I'm not wearing a mask! Don't tell me what to do!" I would have thought that it was stupid as hell. Too unbelievable, something like that would never happen.

 

 

These past four years have been an embarrassing revelation on our American society but man I just can’t seem to get my head around why wearing a mask in this climate has been politicized and almost criminalized. What’s the big deal? It’s like wearing one Has become some sort of perverted scarlet letter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Wolfcop said:

700-some hospitalizations out of 23,000 confirmed cases out of a population of 10.5 million. Use precautions, but keep things open. Those at risk have to use the utmost cautions.

Hey doofus people ARENT using precautions. You not been paying attention to the news? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wes21 said:

Hong Kong is not a reliable source of data.  Back when they had hundreds if not thousands of cases they were reporting 3.

Out of curiosity, did you read any of the links that were presented or did you disregard them at the outset?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Mother Grabber said:

“easily” doesn’t mean it can’t be spread that way.

just like HIV doesn't spread easily in most cases....doesn't mean it CAN'T.

it's almost like...this isn't positive news for you?

Weird

 

1 hour ago, 4Corners said:

Um, I believe a person who is sick and a doctor pointing out where she got it from. Reading comprehension difficult for you?

I'd love to see this article and learn how a Dr. was able to trace a persons step to determine where she became infected, and how they were able to go about testing that surface days / weeks later.

Sounds like a load of poo. Hit me again with the reading comprehension jab though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No point to be made here, just an interesting read.  Here is an excerpt:

"Meanwhile, the second study, from Australian researchers, looked at 217 people on a cruise bound for Antarctica. The ship set sail in mid-March, just after the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus a pandemic.

The first fever on board was reported eight days into the voyage. Over the following two weeks, eight people had to be evacuated from the ship because they fell ill.

  All of the 217 people who remained on board were tested for COVID-19. More than half (59 percent) tested positive, but just 19 percent of those patients had symptoms. The other 81 percent were symptom-free."

Article on Asymptomatic People

The reason I highlighted this section is these vacationers were confined to tight quarters with COVID-19 people and probably did not take immediate measures (quarantine, hand washing, social distancing, mask wearing etc...) to mitigate it as the WHO had just recently called it a pandemic. So this is more realistic than clinical studies because it occurred outside of a controlled setting without any preconceived notions or hypothesis.  The article did not say if any of the medi-vaced patients or those that did show symptoms died from the disease.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GOAT said:

just like HIV doesn't spread easily in most cases....doesn't mean it CAN'T.

it's almost like...this isn't positive news for you?

Weird

 

I'd love to see this article and learn how a Dr. was able to trace a persons step to determine where she became infected, and how they were able to go about testing that surface days / weeks later.

Sounds like a load of poo. Hit me again with the reading comprehension jab though.

Hi DOPE....I mean GOAT. The miracles and achievements of modern medicine are incredible. Whenever you log off of Breitbart or Stormfront -  Please use the google machine for this information. I’m not going to do your research for you. I wish you well in your continued struggle with reality. 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So let me ask you this, and this is assuming you watched the first 2 games of the season. The falcons game was a back and forth between to 2 bad teams until bryce throws 2 crucial picks to help atlanta pull away. The second game was a sloppy game where the defense scored and our offense did absolutely nothing till the 4th quarter, bryce even fumbles and saints return for a TD. If Dalton starts both of those games is the outcome and playout still the same for both games?
    • sure.  I acknowledge we had a rookie making rookie mistakes.  You fail to acknowledge a pushing 40 Dalton however paired up in this trainwreck wasn't going to yield significantly better results. good results.   And Dalton didn't even win his game vs a wrecked Seattle D.  Andy Dalton couldn't even find a way for his team to beat the Carolina freaking Panthers in 2022.  A team with an interim HC, that couldn't score, playing like it was 1970.   And Andy Dalton had REAL weapons on the field at his disposal.   All Dalton had to do was score more than 10 points.  He couldn't pull that off.    I probably got as little faith in Bryce as anyone here.   But I'm not willing to go this Andy Dalton route.  Maybe he wins 4ish here.  But he wasn't doing much here.  Dalton isn't Cincy Dalton.  
    • What do you think really happens here?  Do you think that Seattle loss with half a secondary is a realistic game for Dalton to consistently have?  Do you expect 40 year old Dalton to throw it 60 times and rack up 361 yards while constantly getting hit to work against other teams?  If we played him all year do you think he would rack up 6,137 yards 34 TDs and 0 INTs on over a thousand attempts?  That games wasn't a great game.  We were trailing all game and he threw it against a terrible secondary 60 times averaging 6.6 yards an attempt.  He had one "deep" pass to Chark (wide ass open) for 27 yards who ran another 20 for a TD.  That's not happening against other teams.  I would be surprised if Dalton made it two more games taking those kinds of hits and probably losing both of those games.  Our OL sucked, Our coaches sucked, and our weapons sucked.  Remember Rhule beat Andy Dalton and his Saints offense (which has a better OL and better weapons) just the prior year.  Yeah Matt Rhule...  Darnold put up 43 yards and 2 INTs and Dalton STILL couldn't beat him.  That's embarrassing.
×
×
  • Create New...