Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers returning to a 4-3 defense from a 3-4, which Ron Rivera changed to - in part - at the urging of owner David Tepper


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, micnificent28 said:

This this is why returning to a 4-3 is stupid. Right now we at least have some good pieces and promising others in a 3-4.  Burns Iriving potentially, Haynes and others would make the pass rush efficent. In a 4-3 u got what? Not even addison... you dont have one proven 4-3  end and you need 2. Not to mention another tackle for the 4-3 which we need anyway.

This also puts a meh on say drafting Simmons who isnt a good fit for a 4-3 he would be a fish out of water like burns. The 4-3 just isnt as flexible with positional players in my opinion. You need specific players. I don't like it 

Exactly! Additionally, it’s much easier to pick up players through the draft to fit a 34 defense..especially as college defenses have adapted to the spread offensives they see. I don’t like the idea of going back to a 4-3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh Tepper just wanted an excuse to fire Ron and needed a bad season to do it.

he said during the interviews after the firing he wanted to put his own stamp on the Panthers,..

Ron is in a better place for him.

we see screwed. We wasted an entire draft last year...the whole draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, pdub0702 said:

Exactly! Additionally, it’s much easier to pick up players through the draft to fit a 34 defense..especially as college defenses have adapted to the spread offensives they see. I don’t like the idea of going back to a 4-3

I hate the idea of going back to a 4-3, but this goes right along with the direction of everything today... Panthers are gonna be crap for a while...American Horror Story Burn GIF by AHS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...