Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Verge's Mock Draft and Insight thread 2020


Verge

Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, Verge said:

He'd make a pretty awesome nickel. 

We need a starter and after Captain I never want to see another little person pretending to be an NFL CB.

I feel for the guy. It's not fair but he is 5'9" and as far as I know no one makes platform cleats for the NFL.

 

Edit: 5'8" hell no. 6' plus or bust baby. This isn't the NCAA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Verge said:

Other teams have Amik in the 40s, don't sleep on it.

But 5'8 in the league of giants.. We don't have a big Cb on the roster either.. Is getting a nickle CB more important then a outside CB??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

But 5'8 in the league of giants.. We don't have a big Cb on the roster either.. Is getting a nickle CB more important then a outside CB??

Also, look at our Competition in the league 

Julio 6'3+

Evans 6'4+

Godwin 6'3+

Michael Thomas 6'3+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ncfan said:

Also, look at our Competition in the league 

Julio 6'3+

Evans 6'4+

Godwin 6'3+

Michael Thomas 6'3+

Yeah that's just our division 6 games a year.. And we're talking about a nickle back???.   Oh and I forgot a refreshed  Gronk!!!  Yeah losing Bradberry may be the biggest lost this offseason... 

Get Logan Ryan on the phone..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

But 5'8 in the league of giants.. We don't have a big Cb on the roster either.. Is getting a nickle CB more important then a outside CB??

Arbitrary lines in the sand are how you end up missing out on the Steve Smiths, Tyrann Mathieus, Maurice Jones-Drews, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Arbitrary lines in the sand are how you end up missing out on the Steve Smiths, Tyrann Mathieus, Maurice Jones-Drews, etc.

Good point... I see being small might help in offensive situations and playing in space on defense... But head to head 1 on 1 is a different story..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Arbitrary lines in the sand are how you end up missing out on the Steve Smiths, Tyrann Mathieus, Maurice Jones-Drews, etc.

True but are those guys not the exception and not the rule? 

Plus we already have Jackson for our nickle spot. He isn't an outside CB, maybe one day but that isn't looking great. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Waldo said:

True but are those guys not the exception and not the rule? 

Plus we already have Jackson for our nickle spot. He isn't an outside CB, maybe one day but that isn't looking great. 

There are all kinds of exceptions to the rules out there. Just look at most first round busts to see the flipside of that coin. Guys that checked just about every box but somehow still didn't translate. It's why scouting players will always be more art than science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

But 5'8 in the league of giants.. We don't have a big Cb on the roster either.. Is getting a nickle CB more important then a outside CB??

You’re wanting to draft like we’re going to be competitive this season or even next. 
 

If they have Amik ranked higher you take him and look to fill outside CB another time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

There are all kinds of exceptions to the rules out there. Just look at most first round busts to see the flipside of that coin. Guys that checked just about every box but somehow still didn't translate. It's why scouting players will always be more art than science.

I get what you are saying but A) you expect Hurney to find that exception and B) isn't there other options that fill massive needs with better odds?

Look if we were a 12-4 team with a good roster then I wouldn't mind a swing for a homerun. Let's just get on base at this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...