Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers willing to trade back?


NAS

Recommended Posts

I wouldn't be opposed to sliding back twice.  Once in the first round and again in the third round.  I looked at this yesterday, comparing BBs and seeing the depth still available in the third round coupled with the fact there are seven teams with multiple third round picks behind us that could move up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, FuFuLamePoo said:

This would be so smart. So so so smart

I agree if Simmons, Brown, or Okudah are off the board or if the trade back would still result in ability to draft a quality DT, LB or CB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, theinstrumental said:

I'm all for it unless Tua's there. With all of the holes in the roster I don't think anybody has franchise-changing potential unless they play QB.

How about if Tua is there and we get call to move up for him?  Take him or get more picks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If Brown and Simmons are gone and we're not taking a QB, then we should definitely entertain a trade back. If that doesn't work out, despite lots of hollering from fans, we should probably take the best OT on the board.

If this happens, that position is at least as t locked down for a few years. I'd like Simmons, if not, Thomas or similar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, theinstrumental said:

I'm all for it unless Tua's there. With all of the holes in the roster I don't think anybody has franchise-changing potential unless they play QB.

They say we are not interested in QB, I really think they are set with rolling with Teddy but damn we need someone just in case. We will win to many games next year to be able and get top pick for QB next year as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is just Panthers history pain speaking.
    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
×
×
  • Create New...