Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rapoport: Panthers waive RB


Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, MMA said:

Cut Mike Davis

How does someone poo this post? Mike Davis shouldn’t be on the roster. WTF we still have him on a $3M for the year is beyond me. Do the right thing and cut him so he can find a job for the year. If we waste money on a guy who shouldn’t be getting any carries over Scarlett or Bonnafon then we as fans should be pissed. We paid him over $400k for 2 yards last year. We paid him $5,719 per inch. We don’t need to even bother acting like he’ll be on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, stbugs said:

How does someone poo this post? Mike Davis shouldn’t be on the roster. WTF we still have him on a $3M for the year is beyond me. Do the right thing and cut him so he can find a job for the year. If we waste money on a guy who shouldn’t be getting any carries over Scarlett or Bonnafon then we as fans should be pissed. We paid him over $400k for 2 yards last year. We paid him $5,719 per inch. We don’t need to even bother acting like he’ll be on the roster.

Silly st, dont you know Davis is going to replace CMC cause he got injured. Then Davis will have the one of best seasons for RBs. Marty will tag him and sign him to top ten deal. History repeats its self! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, stbugs said:

How does someone poo this post? Mike Davis shouldn’t be on the roster. WTF we still have him on a $3M for the year is beyond me. Do the right thing and cut him so he can find a job for the year. If we waste money on a guy who shouldn’t be getting any carries over Scarlett or Bonnafon then we as fans should be pissed. We paid him over $400k for 2 yards last year. We paid him $5,719 per inch. We don’t need to even bother acting like he’ll be on the roster.

I love the myth out there that Scarlett is good.  Had we not drafted him last year he wouldn’t have been drafted.  He wasn’t good at Florida and I don’t really see him being on anyone’s 53.  Bonnafon on the other hand is our number 2 RB, so it really doesn’t matter who number 3 is.   Davis has a lot of talent and can catch pretty well though.  He seems to fit joe Brady’s offense, so maybe that’s why they’ve held on to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you've nailed what we need right here.  Rodriguez and Thieneman would be my choices, Thieneman in the first and Rodriguez in the second. Let everyone else eat up their picks on the crop of WRs and linemen. Then make a push in free agency for the top center.
    • Vernon Gholston vibes?  had 14 sacks at Ohio State in 2007; 45 games in the NFL:  0 sacks.  
    • I want a high impact player, but a true FS who could qb the secondary might be more effective than we realize.  I don't think Moehrig is that guy (I think he is overpaid, however).  I want a flashy, high impact player, but we could use defensive qbs at ILB  and FS.  By upgrading skill AND adding vision and leadership, could we get better than if we added an edge or OT? I am not sure that I believe this myself, but I try to look at things from all perspectives.  Here is some devil's advocacy stuff: 1. EDGE-We are freaking out about the pressure we put on the qb from the edge position.  However, Jones II and Wonnum missed a total of 22 games. Scourton was a rookie and Princely was a third rounder.  Wharton sucked (not sure if he was used properly--a hybrid who can rush from the 5 tech or 3, etc), and this put more pressure on Scourton and the other edge players.  This year, we get Jones II, Scourton should continue to evolve with Princely.  Perhaps another rookie is not what we need.  Maybe a veteran situational pass rusher.  2. OFFENSIVE TACKLE:  Of course, we need an OT, but the draft is loaded with OTs that can pass block but struggle in run blocking--so a rookie at LT might not be the answer for a team that wants to run first.  What to do?  I am not sure.  I see Nijman returning after testing the market, but who knows? 3.  INSIDE LB:  A huge need, regardless of how you spin it.  However, I see a few free agents who would be solid here, and I see the second round having a few ILBs with starting potential.  I do not see an ILB worth the first round pick unless a freak falls to us. 4.  With veteran defensive backs, a young, intelligent FS could fit in nicely. Intelligence is key--like the way Luke made the front 7 better. "A good, intelligent free safety (FS) acts as the "quarterback of the defense" transforming a unit from good to great by acting as the last line of defense, communicating pre-snap adjustments, and anticipating plays before they happen. By reading the quarterback's eyes and diagnosing offensive schemes, an intelligent FS acts as a "centerfielder" who can neutralize deep threats and mitigate errors made by cornerbacks or linebackers."  
×
×
  • Create New...