Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For the anti Curtis Samuel panther fans


Mister

Recommended Posts

   Joe Brady is switching to 4 and 5 receiver sets and phasing out the two tight end sets we’ve seen over the past decade (perfect fit because Thomas fits that Scheme but we won’t necessarily rely on him manhertz and devalve) and we have a nice receiver room. Curtis Samuel is the #3 receiver on the team if not the number 2, he could be devastating to opposing D coming out of the slot. Seth Roberts, Pharoh Cooper aren’t even close to Curtis and might not even make the team imo. My guess is he’s 3rd at worst 4th in targets which isn’t bad considering the amount of receiving players Brady will use in his scheme  .Samuel is just beginning to perform like the wide receiver we hoped that he would blossom into. The ex-running back makes spectacular catch after spectacular catch while having the potential to be one of the more elusive RAC receivers in the NFL (just watch Philly or NYG game). He drops some balls and isn’t an elite route runner. A new coaching staff can absolutely clean up his routes and add new ways to get him the ball (designed runs, additional route combinations) If anyone can do it Joe Brady can and should. If the panthers do turn it around it will probably be in 2-3 seasons from now, and in that time Samuels contract will expire. Samuel has not proved that he deserves a mega contract after injury riddled seasons to begin his career. The panthers should resign Samuel to a new deal before this season in case he does emerge as a legitimate receiver in the prime of their career. Trading him will likely only return a round 2+ draft pick at most on account of the lack of time remaining on his rookie deal. Resign him now for a team friendly deal that will keep him under contract through his prime. Him Dj and Robby is something to work with for the foreseeable future, we can’t just blow it up with how heavily we’ve invested at that position including our misses funchess kelvin Bejamin and Armanti Edwards (a few that come to mind... god I hate Dwayne Jarrett). And when Anderson’s 3 year deal ends, let him be the one to go. Season ticket holder since 96 Keep pounding P.s. Fair play to Matt and Hurney for an excellent draft, Phil Snow should be excited to get to work! And no I don’t think you pay Logan Ryan 9 mil for him to come play 8-8 (at best) football .Sure I’m just giving my opinion on the situation. I don’t want him to go. I do have a weird feeling since he unfollowed the team on social media

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there "Anti-Samuel" fans on here??

IMO, it's not a lack of talent with Samuel, rather how ineffectively he was utilized by our previous coaching staff. Samuel could be our 2nd best weapon after CMC this year in Brady's system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If we constantly run four and five wide sets, I set the over/under on Bridgewater to IR at 4.5 games.

Anything that gets us back in the race for a real franchise QB is fine for me. We enjoyed having Cam until his body fell apart, but a QB who throws for 3000 and 14 TDs and doesn’t run isn’t getting us to the promised land.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Anything that gets us back in the race for a real franchise QB is fine for me. We enjoyed having Cam until his body fell apart, but a QB who throws for 3000 and 14 TDs and doesn’t run isn’t getting us to the promised land.

Not without an epic D and CMC running his body into retirement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Waldo said:

Not without an epic D and CMC running his body into retirement.

Having the former would be shocking his season. Unfortunately, it won't shock me if we resort to the latter after placeholder Teddy fails to light a fire under the offense. I just hope that with a new staff they won't feel the urgency to run CMC into the dirt in a desperate effort to save their job or get the job. I hope to see his workload dialed back significantly when/if we're out of contention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Having the former would be shocking his season. Unfortunately, it won't shock me if we resort to the latter after placeholder Teddy fails to light a fire under the offense. I just hope that with a new staff they won't feel the urgency to run CMC into the dirt in a desperate effort to save their job or get the job. I hope to see his workload dialed back significantly when/if we're out of contention.

Unfortunately I think that will be the case. For every in-completion on 1st and 10, expect a run or some type of wheel route to CMC. And if that is out of a 3+ WR set , he may get yardage but there will be a physical price. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bytes said:

Unfortunately I think that will be the case. For every in-completion on 1st and 10, expect a run or some type of wheel route to CMC. And if that is out of a 3+ WR set , he may get yardage but there will be a physical price. 

I think Rhule and company are going to get three years to prove "the process" can work at the NFL level. You shouldn't make a bold hire like this if you're not going to give it time to work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Bytes said:

Unfortunately I think that will be the case. For every in-completion on 1st and 10, expect a run or some type of wheel route to CMC. And if that is out of a 3+ WR set , he may get yardage but there will be a physical price. 

I dont think there will be many incompletions on 1st down in this offense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Having the former would be shocking his season. Unfortunately, it won't shock me if we resort to the latter after placeholder Teddy fails to light a fire under the offense. I just hope that with a new staff they won't feel the urgency to run CMC into the dirt in a desperate effort to save their job or get the job. I hope to see his workload dialed back significantly when/if we're out of contention.

Player management is not something I trust yet due to no facts but I am hopeful. I don't see how job security is an issue this year and likely next year. It would have to go terrible sideways for that to be an issue this year. I expect the D will get blown out and grow as the year goes on. That would put more on Ted than CMC I would guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...