Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who had the better season?: 2019 CMC vs 2005 Steve Smith


Car123

Recommended Posts

On 6/22/2020 at 2:48 PM, jfra78 said:

Steve Smith by a mile.  CMC had a great season, but was force fed those numbers.  Smitty was unstoppable that year.

that year smitty could do no wrong, best year I've ever seen a WR have, only if the rest of the offense was a bit better....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CMC and i would say it's not really close at all.  Smith was on a much better team with a much better quaterback.  Neither of their seasons are easy to do but everyone knew CMC was getting the ball and he still produced.  Smith did as well but way to many teams just put 1 guy on Steve and expected to stop him.  I am looking at you Chicago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/25/2020 at 11:17 AM, bababoey said:

CMC and i would say it's not really close at all.  Smith was on a much better team with a much better quaterback.  Neither of their seasons are easy to do but everyone knew CMC was getting the ball and he still produced.  Smith did as well but way to many teams just put 1 guy on Steve and expected to stop him.  I am looking at you Chicago. 

Eh, my main argument is the 2 times cmc was stopped short on 4th and 1.  This isnt a slight on him, he is amazing and definitely elite, but when recognizing all time greats, stuff like that doesnt happen.  Put the ball in smitty's hand in 2005, I dont care if it's a yard or a mile, it was gonna get done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The right answer is neither and drafting Maye with the #1 Pick of the 2024 Draft lmfao we traded away the #1 in a QB LOADED DRAFT
    • I have no idea why you are so irrationally upset about the notion that going out and spending $150 million free agency dollars on two interior offensive linemen could be construed as a panic response after our #1 pick we traded a fortune for had one of the worst rookie seasons of the last 25 years. It is objectively what transpired. Dan Morgan as of right now is a mixed bag. Some really good some so so some not so good some bad some really bad. You take any rational criticism personally like you are related to him or something. That's something you'll have to figure out for yourself. Anyways. The predicament Dan Morgan finds himself in for this year will define his future as GM. I sincerely hope he navigates it to perfection. But the circumstances are largely of his own creation. And not just in his stint as GM but going back to his time as assistant GM. Which conveniently people like yourself don't like to talk about. That is the reality of the situation. I like how you will carry water for Dan Morgan to the point of getting into random spats with people but make no mention of Bryce Young's glaring limitations and shortcomings as a starting QB yet go out of your way to put the onus of our struggles squarely on Canales. I mean I've been quite critical of Canales too but he sure isn't the only one to blame for our problems.
    • They weren't well thought out. We needed one, not both. 2 top center/guard candidates were going to be available in the 2nd. We would have been fine with JPJ or Frazier. Drafting either over XL or Brooks would have made perfect sense. Hell, drafting both would have made sense even if we had signed Lewis or Hunt. Instead we drafted a 1 year wonder project WR and a luxury RB that we didn't need since we had Hubbard. Draft IOL, pay tackles. Plenty of 2nd round guards and centers start immediately and play very well. Those 2 picks were not good then, now, no matter how much explaining anyone tries to do. Several of called it then. 
×
×
  • Create New...