Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you trade Curtis Samuel to the 49ers for a DE?

hepcat

By hepcat,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, electro's horse said:

that dude was so fuging stupid and people on here would fall over themselves because he would spend pages saying "actually the player that looks bad is good"

Meh, I don't necessarily think he's stupid. I just think he tried way too hard to push alternate viewpoints and would engage in hilarious mental gymanstics to defend those viewpoints no matter what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toomers Mentor

Toomers

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

You dont make knee jerk trades when trying to build. Winning now is not important.

Seriously! 
 

   You want to call “winning isn’t important” Now? After blasting anyone who even suggested that for how long now. Which side of the hypocritical fence are you really on? Or did you just want to complain about everything everyone posts? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

One of biggest criticisms of Gettleman was his willingness to spend premium draft picks on redundancies. KB in the 1st and then Funchess in the 2nd the next year. CMC on the 1st and Samuel in the 2nd in the same draft. Bradberry in the 2nd and Worley in the 3rd in the same draft. In each of these cases, he basically drafted a poor man's version of the guy he'd just drafted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, Jeremy Igo said:

No team in their right mind would trade a 3rd for a #3 WR that hasn't produced and will be a free agent soon anyways. 

They should be working the phones trying to get a big LB or DE for him. San Francisco might be desperate enough at WR to make a move for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

No team in their right mind would trade a 3rd for a #3 WR that hasn't produced and will be a free agent soon anyways. 

Yeah, if we could actually get a 3rd for him I think he'd be gone. I'm not sure what we could get but I doubt it'd be much. That's why I wanted to keep him and hope he developed. We'll see. We're only one game in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toomers Mentor

Toomers

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, if we could actually get a 3rd for him I think he'd be gone. I'm not sure what we could get but I doubt it'd be much. That's why I wanted to keep him and hope he developed. We'll see. We're only one game in.

Go to team with the biggest need and a lot of extra comp picks. And a QB familiar with Samuel. Could probably get a late 4th. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      Trevor Lawrence available next year?

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      This guy pre-draft was saying he could take or leave football, and he seems to have been playing with that mentality ever since lol.  
    • BritishPanther
      Time to Start Roughing Out the '26 Draft--Needs and Pecking Order

      By BritishPanther · Posted

      Agreed, another safety would be nice. Bud Clark, TCU, is one I would like to see us take a flyer on later in the draft, if he stays healthy and we don't take someone earlier. I just really hope we draft a solid C this year. Tired of seeing us cycle through average to below average players in that area.
    • carpanfan96
      Downfield Disparity

      By carpanfan96 · Posted

      Bryce doesn't like throwing into the middle of the field unless the play broke down or it's set up to give him a passing lane.  So because of this issue, most of the passing offense has to be outside the numbers towards the boundary. So you see him throw a lot of dump offs, swing routes, short side out routes, comebacks or deep balls outside the numbers using the boundary as protection of an interception.    Pretty easy for a NFL defense to see this and scheme against it.  All you have to do is run a shell cover 2 deep dime, LB plays a hook underneath, take the flat away with a blitz/flat zone option for the two inside DB's, outside two DB's play hook zone underneath and carry anything deep.    Pretty much what NO ran to take away Rico while also limiting What Bryce can do as well. 
×
×
  • Create New...