Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Teddy B's Panthers Debut


Icege

Recommended Posts

Overall, I give him a 6/10.

Made some really good reads and quick decisions.  Was impressed with his mobility , hadn't seen that much from him.

 

He also had some pretty inexcusable misses on wide open receivers.  I'll mark that as rust/timing unless it continues.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Basically what I expected. Not great. But not terrible either. When you score 30 you didn't lose due to your offense. But with that said, you're going to have to have the ability to win shootouts to win a Super Bowl in today's NFL. 

Need a better 2 minute offense.  We had a chance to win and blew it in the last 2 minutes.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jfra78 said:

Need a better 2 minute offense.  We had a chance to win and blew it in the last 2 minutes.  

What? That drive started with 4:03 left on the clock. You already admitted to not watching the game so you should probably just stop. Much like the guy you quoted who spent his summer littering every thread with the same 3 posts bashing Teddy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Need a better 2 minute offense.  We had a chance to win and blew it in the last 2 minutes.  

When it came down to it, it seems like Brady didn't trust Teddy to win the game. When we got the ball back with 4:08 remaining, we ran five plays. All five were handoffs ultimately ending up in a turnover on downs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

When it came down to it, it seems like Brady didn't trust Teddy to win the game. When we got the ball back with 4:08 remaining, we ran five plays. All five were handoffs ultimately ending up in a turnover on downs.

I'm not sure it says that.

McCaffrey was getting it done. Ignoring that would be a mistake.

(clearly)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not sure it says that.

McCaffrey was getting it done. Ignoring that would be a mistake.

(clearly)

He was but we went to the well too many times. His last three runs were all for three yards apiece. The Raiders sold out to stop CMC from beating them and we played right into their hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

He was but we went to the well too many times. His last three runs were all for three yards apiece. The Raiders sold out to stop CMC from beating them and we played right into their hands.

Play action would have been a nice idea given what was happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

What? That drive started with 4:03 left on the clock. You already admitted to not watching the game so you should probably just stop. Much like the guy you quoted who spent his summer littering every thread with the same 3 posts bashing Teddy. 

I was off on the timing but clearly they had the ball in the last 2 minutes of the game.  No I couldn't watch the game because I work on Sundays.  I listened to the game starting with our TD drive in the 4th on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He had a turnover on all three goals he was on the ice for. Plus he had that god awful delay of game penalty. Like legit his GS actually shows he was the cause of the loss and he was only on the ice for 12 minutes. You remove him from that game and the Canes win or at worst go to OT.  Let's put this in perspective, in 12 minutes he directly led to 3 goals against. In the 48 minutes without him on the ice it was an even-steven 2-2 game and that's disregarding that god awful delay of game penalty that led to goal number 4 of the 5 given up.      I don't see how anyone could say that he didn't directly lead to the loss.   
    • reality is the piling on of Frank Reich is just the standard huddle angle we take of putting all blame on someone after the fact.   as I was an OG Frank hater before it was cool to be......now the swing goes too far the other way and people will claim me is as a Frank defender.  Frank Reich was the definition of a .500 middle of the road NFL coach.  He technically was a winning coach and above .500 coming here but he is and was NFL average.  we were the biggest joke in a decade.....because they paired Frank Reich (a dude who was going to do what he does in the NFL) with a dude who couldn't do NFL basics and Frank was forced to play him.  That's not Frank being a loser.  That a bad org around Frank. 
    • Toronto is less physical than us, and they took them to 7  I really wish they would have won, because we match up better with them, but we have to deal with what we got  What worries me is Svech trying to take out Bob, that is desperation, that's what you do when you feel like there is no legit options left, it's what I feared, Bob is still in our core groups head, and they are over thinking, over passing Hopefully that changes tonight   
×
×
  • Create New...