Opinions: if Lawrence is gone, what's the plan then?

[PantherOnTheProwl1523]

With all these QB's in the draft could 1 or 2 could end up Jimmy Clausen types and many want Trevor on the team with all the hype. 

[mrcompletely11]

11 minutes ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

How do you know he does. Try getting proof that he will fit our scheme then come back with feasible evidence. Not one of the upcoming QB's in this draft class could fit our scheme.

Because there is not a throw he cannot make.  And he is mobile.  What proof do you need?   What exactly do you think our "scheme" is?

[Shocker]

I honestly don't think Lawrence over Fields is a slam dunk either.  Fields was better last year to be honest.

[PantherOnTheProwl1523]

11 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Because there is not a throw he cannot make.  And he is mobile.  What proof do you need?   What exactly do you think our "scheme" is?

Not enough proof at all. There is no evidence any of these QB's will even transition into the NFL as a star player yet and they are already being paraded as such.

[mrcompletely11]

2 minutes ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

Not enough proof at all. There is no evidence any of these QB's will even transition into the NFL as a star player yet and they are already being paraded as such.

What is our scheme?

 

While that may be true about them transitioning I would say 99.9% of the scouts all have TL rated as the best prospect since Luck.  On the peyton manning level.  I would be more than willing to let Joe Brady work with him then rolling with Teddy like you want to do

 

And having the hot take of Trevor Lawrence isnt good is just so juvenile and weak. 

[PantherOnTheProwl1523]

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

What is our scheme?

 

While that may be true about them transitioning I would say 99.9% of the scouts all have TL rated as the best prospect since Luck.  On the peyton manning level.  I would be more than willing to let Joe Brady work with him then rolling with Teddy like you want to do

 

And having the hot take of Trevor Lawrence isnt good is just so juvenile and weak. 

Again he is a college level QB and what he or any other QB can do has to be a proven play or not play at NFL level. So until he has proven he can play at a high level he is not good until he has sealed his spot as a starting player. You still would deny facts if they stared you in the face.

[mrcompletely11]

1 minute ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

Again he is a college level QB and what he or any other QB can do has to be a proven play or not play at NFL level. So until he has proven he can play at a high level he is not good until he has sealed his spot as a starting player.

Thats some interesting logic you roll with there

[Captroop]

If we're there at 1, obviously you take Trevor. But if we're a top 5, I honestly think you grab the highest rated OL, and nab what QB you can get in the second.

I like Fields and Lance, but neither is a singular talent who will be able to succeed behind the OLine we have right now. And we're more than a pick or two away from fixing it. So the question is who can succeed, or at least survive long enough for us to get the rest of our team in order. Here's a fun game: Close your eyes when you're watching their highlight videos, and see how much of each player's reel is the announcer yelling, "Wide Open!"

[klumme]

25 minutes ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

Again he is a college level QB and what he or any other QB can do has to be a proven play or not play at NFL level. So until he has proven he can play at a high level he is not good until he has sealed his spot as a starting player. You still would deny facts if they stared you in the face.

Agree.  We should go after the college QB with most NFL starts....

[AU-panther]

28 minutes ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

Again he is a college level QB and what he or any other QB can do has to be a proven play or not play at NFL level. So until he has proven he can play at a high level he is not good until he has sealed his spot as a starting player. You still would deny facts if they stared you in the face.

so what's your point?  never draft a QB

Nobody is saying he is guaranteed to be a hall of famer.  What people are saying, is that based on standard evaluations that football people use, he is on one of the best QB "prospects" to come out in recent history.

 

 

 

[Mr. Scot]

I'm surprised more of our resident Tarheel guys haven't been in here pushing to wait for Sam Howell.

[t96]

57 minutes ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

Again he is a college level QB and what he or any other QB can do has to be a proven play or not play at NFL level. So until he has proven he can play at a high level he is not good until he has sealed his spot as a starting player. You still would deny facts if they stared you in the face.

But this is 100% true about every college player entering the draft ever. You have to pick 1 of them at your spot...

[DeAngelo Beason]

If Lawrence is gone, you trade three first rounders to whoever drafted him to get him.  

 

Yes, he's that good.

[Jmac]

6 hours ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

If Lawrence is gone, you trade three first rounders to whoever drafted him to get him.  

 

Yes, he's that good.

This team can't afford to lose three first rounders....team needs every draft pick they have or can get.