Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3-3-5 and are we wasting burns?


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

Personally for me im a schematics guy. I love to pressure the qb so I was in favor of the 3-4. The 3-3-5 is great at stoping the pass but at the expense of getting gashed in the run as we are.  And its only good against the pass if you have the horses to make it work. We picking up "horses" from the waiver wire on top of not really having a number 1 cb. That spells disaster for this defense already.

We are the only nfl team without a single sack..  not 1. How is that possible??? For me I love burns.. is he perfect no.. he isn't a positive in the run game and brings 0 to the power rush department. But as a speed rusher there are maybe only 5 or so guys that are better in that department if you as me. So why is he either not on the field or out in the flats on coverage assignments so often? 

I wanted to take a few to post some thoughts on Brown as well. I was never in the corner of taking a nose tackle so high when you have a gaping hole in the pass rush. He is pretty good at what he does so far... but is it top 7 good? Meh... seemed like a luxury pick to me like you can go nose if you have all the other important pieces in place like qb,LT, edge, cb, and then you can choose between say specific only positions like nose,middle,lb and so on. 

Just my early season thoughts and ramblings... im sure many wont agree and I could be wrong but this is how I see thing right now. With the loss of cmc for a few weeks I think we should fully embrace the tank mode and accept it for what it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We were very good at rushing the passer at the expense of not being able to stop the run at all last year. IMO, so far this iteration is preferable to that. Then again, we haven't faced an elite QB yet who doesn't need the assistance of a walker on the field, so we'll see if that holds up.

2019

Team Defense: 31st

Passing Defense: 13th

Rushing Defense: 29th

Scoring Defense: 31st

2020

Team Defense: 27th

Passing Defense: 12th

Rushing Defense: 19th

Scoring Defense: 27th

 

It's better. Definitely not much, but it is better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We were very good at rushing the passer at the expense of not being able to stop the run at all last year. IMO, so far this iteration is preferable to that. Then again, we haven't faced an elite QB yet who doesn't need the assistance of a walker on the field, so we'll see if that holds up.

It's not like we're stopping the run very well this year... Jacobs and Fournette (yuck) absolutely gashed us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would guess in a 3-3-5 Burns is basically a Dlineman that stands up labeled as a LBer, moves around to favorable matchups and shouldn't be covering poo unless the DC is trying to get unnecessarily cute. The question there is who are the 3 upfront? I wouldn't mind building it but to expect bodies to fill spots based on pure theory makes me look to last year and doubt we could pull it off without a full 2 seasons to build it right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly they should probably trade Burns now when someone might be willing to give up a nice DP. Typical tweener guy who is a 3-4 edge rusher. Doesn’t fit our scheme. I didn’t love the pick to begin with and FSU ends don’t have a very good track record in NFL. Marty didn’t learn his lesson with Everette Brown. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NCBlu said:

3-3-5  will not work in the NFL teams will just run all over you. Could not believe when i seen that on 1st downs and guess what they ran right at it.

Agree, it’s a college defense. Might work against Rutgers, Indiana, and TCU but it is not a defense for the NFL. I can’t believe we are even having this conversation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our run defense looks better and that’s with Whitehead instead of Luke. Our defensive line is much better at stopping the run that it was last year. It’s how we were able to get back into the game against the Raiders and the Bucs. We need a MLB and safety and we might have a good young defense next year. They should really try Shaq and MLB and Chinn/Carter on the outside. Shaq can’t be worse than Whitehead and it will let a better player like Carter get on the field in his place...

I kind of like Burris & Chinn at safeties, Douglas & Pride on the outside, Jackson at NB, with Shaq at MLB and Carter at OLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...