Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule on Joe Brady's progression


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Matt Rhule had some thoughts on the offensive play calling and what has been different as of late.

Quote

One of the things that has happen the first couple games, is we went out expecting one defense and
then getting another, something different. So, I think our whole staff, when I say Joe, that’s really the whole
offensive staff, has really tried to hone in on hey, what are really the things we do well and really do them well. I
think there was a really good run plan this week. We knew they were going to pressure us. I though Pat Meyer
and Marcus Satterfield and those guys did a great job. So, I think all of us are really growing. That’s game four,
that’s really kind of like the end of the preseason, what would have been the end of the preseason.

It is nice to see them focusing on the things they really do well. More meat, less bread. Pounding the ball with Davis with the occasional long throw to Robby or DJ is some fun football watchin. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what smart coaching looks like. Joe Brady has done a great job with situational play calling after the failed 4th and 1 against the Raiders. We saw the Panthers run that sake play against the Cardinals to convert a 3rd and short to Alex Armah up the middle, and that seemed to energize the team. 

Really nice to see the team utilize what they have and scheme around player strengths and weaknesses. I think we all like what we see from the offense, especially not losing a beat after McCaffrey went down. The fact the Panthers are 2-0 without CMC is shocking and bodes very well for the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Matt Rhule had some thoughts on the offensive play calling and what has been different as of late.

It is nice to see them focusing on the things they really do well. More meat, less bread. Pounding the ball with Davis with the occasional long throw to Robby or DJ is some fun football watchin. 

I could not imagine Joe Brady with a prime Cam. Lawd, that would’ve been deadly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

We will probably lose Brady at the end of the season.

Nah I bet we have him for at least 2 maybe even 3 seasons. He’s so young and this is only his 2nd season coaching in the NFL. McDermott took awhile to get his first head coaching gig and we all knew he was talented. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you're telling me we open the second half with zylstra, roberts, and god knows who else on the field and get a first down on 1 play? wtf is happening here?   and there are a lot of players getting some time and experience that i don't think would ever see the field in past regimes w/out injury.  i just really like what's happening all the way around.  we're actually not stupid.  i'm really kinda in shock.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brady is a really young, smart coach.  I love what I've seen, but a HC has to be a leader of men.  I've heard lots of good things about Brady, but I just don't think he's ready.  A couple more years, then sure.  

If I were Brady, I'd be careful about jumping on the first team that throws Rhule money at him.  There are only 32 NFL HC positions, and we've seen countless times good coaches get bounced out, get in over their heads, and ruin their careers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Nah I bet we have him for at least 2 maybe even 3 seasons. He’s so young and this is only his 2nd season coaching in the NFL. McDermott took awhile to get his first head coaching gig and we all knew he was talented. 

McDermott is a defensive coach, look at guys like Mcvay, Leflour, Taylor, Kingsbury all these guys have as much experience as Brady. It’s the new trend to go with a young offensive coach

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Brady is an offensive wiz but very new to being a coach. It takes so much more to being a successful head coach than just calling good plays. He is no where near ready to be a head coach. 

 

1 hour ago, GoobyPls said:

We will probably lose Brady at the end of the season.

I don't think he's been in the pros long enough to establish enough connections to put together a staff. Mcdermott had been in the league for over a decade, McVay was in the NFL for 7/8 years before getting a head coaching job so he had the connections. 

This is only Brady's second year in the NFL. I'm not sure he could put together a staff on his own just yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he gets an opportunity then he needs to take it that’s just the way it goes. There is no rhyme or reason on how or when a coach gets a gig. It’s 1 of 32 positions in the NFL and when you get one you just take it because there may not be a second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...