Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Avoided tackles per carry. (Guess who is best)


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, heelsnum1 said:

Unfortunately he is on a one year deal; I doubt we will be able to commit too much more cap space to the RB position going forward.  I hope we can somehow keep him though.

I say enjoy it while it lasts then...Let someone overpay in FA, we get a comp pick and he gets paid like he should. Seems like a win-win. Hopefully we have something special in the new young RBs we have been stashing on the PS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like the RB by committee approach.  I fear that as soon as CMC comes back, Mike Davis isn't going to get enough carries to start building up steam and he'll be cast aside.  We did the exact same thing with CJ Anderson.  Hopefully this coaching staff understands that a power back needs a dozen carries or so before the defense starts feeling the punishment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

I don't like the RB by committee approach.  I fear that as soon as CMC comes back, Mike Davis isn't going to get enough carries to start building up steam and he'll be cast aside.  We did the exact same thing with CJ Anderson.  Hopefully this coaching staff understands that a power back needs a dozen carries or so before the defense starts feeling the punishment.

GLARINGLY different coaching staff bro. Take your Rivera vision down 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, raz said:

i don't know whether to call him big mike, or slick because of his head

These are the issues that keep us up at night.  :thinking:

Seriously, I despise Marty Hurney, but the decision to keep Davis and his $5m salary on the roster was not popular with me.  He was not playing.  That is not to say that I did not want him to play (Gamecock fan) but it could suggest that the team understood the mental issues he was going through and found it was wise to let him work through it.

Secondly, his coach was Rivera.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, imminent rogaine said:

I was expecting to see Djax or Tre Boston on the top of the list. I guess I misunderstood what you meant by “avoided tackles per carry”

thank god i didn't have coffee in my mouth.   good one!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

These are the issues that keep us up at night.  :thinking:

Seriously, I despise Marty Hurney, but the decision to keep Davis and his $5m salary on the roster was not popular with me.  He was not playing.  That is not to say that I did not want him to play (Gamecock fan) but it could suggest that the team understood the mental issues he was going through and found it was wise to let him work through it.

Secondly, his coach was Rivera.

 

Mike Davis only counts as 3M, he's not that expensive guys need to stop tripping on this. (1.4% of the cap is what he takes up)

https://overthecap.com/player/mike-davis/3974/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...