Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Davis and Stewart/Tolbert


Devil Doc

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Bartin said:

Please let their be a snap split of 80/20 when CMC gets back. Ideally, it would be 70/30, but I will happily settle for 80/20. Like just give Davis a series early in the 2nd quarter and one in the middle of the 3rd.

I have a feeling they will bring CMC back slowly. Ultimately, I think it would be nice to see something like 80/40 where both are on the field at the same time for like 20% of the snaps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jfra78 said:

I have a feeling they will bring CMC back slowly. Ultimately, I think it would be nice to see something like 80/40 where both are on the field at the same time for like 20% of the snaps

you basically kick Samuel off the field and let CMC play his position to get both on the field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jfra78 said:

I have a feeling they will bring CMC back slowly. Ultimately, I think it would be nice to see something like 80/40 where both are on the field at the same time for like 20% of the snaps

I’d be good with that too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are hating on the take, but I see what you’re saying.  He runs hard as fug and fights for every yard.  I didn’t start watching football until 2009ish so I didn’t see Stephen Davis play.  Mike Davis’ balancing ability while still churning forwards reminds me a lot of Stew.  Fitting that he wears the number.  He’s impressed me so much these past few weeks.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, PandaMan said:

People are hating on the take, but I see what you’re saying.  He runs hard as fug and fights for every yard.  I didn’t start watching football until 2009ish so I didn’t see Stephen Davis play.  Mike Davis’ balancing ability while still churning forwards reminds me a lot of Stew.  Fitting that he wears the number.  He’s impressed me so much these past few weeks.  

2003 was magic, sorry you missed it.

heres a video of Steven Davis

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Davis is great, but I think by the end of the year, there will be teams lined up to try and sign him. He'll have earned a bigger paycheck than we can probably offer him.

He really is starter quality as a RB and better than a lot of teams are fielding. Older guy who runs hard, has veteran instincts and truly values opportunities while having low mileage can be really attractive, especially with the game tape he's building up.

Still, if he was willing to stay for what he's making now, it'd be a no brainer to keep him around as our #2 RB.

It seems as though he’s running harder because the current staff recognizes his abilities and gave him a chance to showcase it. He’s bounced around the league quite a bit, maybe he’s found a home?
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...