Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule is PISSED


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

Was just watching his presser and he is hot.  Face is red and he has repeatedly lamented just in the first 2 minutes that the decision to take the FG attempt was less than ideal.  And he's not holding any punches...

It's weird, bc as hard as I've been on Teddy, from my point of view, despite the long-standing rule that you CANNOT take a sack when in FG range, I felt like the way they sent the pressure it was virtually impossible not to lose yards there, either via sack or intentional grounding.  So, I finally felt like that issue wasn't on Teddy, but Rhule is insinuating it is.  They asked him if he felt Teddy could've gotten rid of it on 3rd down, and he said, "You can't take a sack there.  I don't care who it is on - the offensive line, the running back, the receivers, Teddy...  you just can't take a sack there.  Teddy can't take a sack there."

Yikes.

I felt Teddy played one of his best games today, but honestly, both he and Brady appear to be having some consistent issues late in games.

And while I'm here, I have to disagree with Jeremy's assertion that we got outcoached today.  Against a team and staff who have absolutely demolished and embarrassed Ron and Co. the last few years, and the team and staff I consider the cream of the crop of our division despite all Tampa has done, we pushed them to the very edge...  Had the officials not spotted them points and multiple new sets of downs on 3rd down situations, and if the defense could have done ANYTHING in the first half, that game is won easily.  I HATE moral victories, and although I'm disappointed we lost, I am inexplicably upbeat after this game.  Despite the struggles, I am incredibly encouraged by the adjustments we see made every week following the half.  This staff is special...  they are just different from anything we've had before.  We just got beat by a better overall team today.  We need defensive help badly.  The end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see how that sack is on Teddy.  We've all seen our QBs thru the years dancing around and run backwards and take a huge sack when we can't afford to, but the pressure came off the side instantly and when he tried to step up Davis lost his block (hard to ask a RB to block a DL, anyway), and that is when the play ended.  I'll need to see a replay of it... perhaps he had more time than it seemed.

We've all seen playcalls where the ball is out immediately after the snap.  Surprised that wasn't the call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hepcat said:

He’s not wrong and it’s true the offense has played like a bunch of assholes with the game on the line in the 4th quarter 

I agree.  So far, that is the biggest issue offensively...  game winning/tying drives are a problem both for Brady and Teddy and Co.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Was just watching his presser and he is hot.  Face is red and he has repeatedly lamented just in the first 2 minutes that the decision to take the FG attempt was less than ideal.  And he's not holding any punches...

It's weird, bc as hard as I've been on Teddy, from my point of view, despite the long-standing rule that you CANNOT take a sack when in FG range, I felt like the way they sent the pressure it was virtually impossible not to lose yards there, either via sack or intentional grounding.  So, I finally felt like that issue wasn't on Teddy, but Rhule is insinuating it is.  They asked him if he felt Teddy could've gotten rid of it on 3rd down, and he said, "You can't take a sack there.  I don't care who it is on - the offensive line, the running back, the receivers, Teddy...  you just can't take a sack there.  Teddy can't take a sack there."

Yikes.

I felt Teddy played one of his best games today, but honestly, both he and Brady appear to be having some consistent issues late in games.

And while I'm here, I have to disagree with Jeremy's assertion that we got outcoached today.  Against a team and staff who have absolutely demolished and embarrassed Ron and Co. the last few years, and the team and staff I consider the cream of the crop of our division despite all Tampa has done, we pushed them to the very edge...  Had the officials not spotted them points and multiple new sets of downs on 3rd down situations, and if the defense could have done ANYTHING in the first half, that game is won easily.  I HATE moral victories, and although I'm disappointed we lost, I am inexplicably upbeat after this game.  Despite the struggles, I am incredibly encouraged by the adjustments we see made every week following the half.  This staff is special...  they are just different from anything we've had before.  We just got beat by a better overall team today.  We need help defensive help badly.  The end.

His golden boy OC should never, ever have called that screen.  One, Davis is too slow for that. Two Davis has been nicked  up 

and THREE.  ALWAYS PUT THE HANDS IN YOUR PLAYMAKER’s HANDS FOR THE LAST DRIVE AND THAt  IS NOT MIKE

that stupid screen sealed it   
period 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

I don't see how that sack is on Teddy.  We've all seen our QBs thru the years dancing around and run backwards and take a huge sack when we can't afford to, but the pressure came off the side instantly and when he tried to step up Davis lost his block (hard to ask a RB to block a DL, anyway), and that is when the play ended.  I'll need to see a replay of it... perhaps he had more time than it seemed.

We've all seen playcalls where the ball is out immediately after the snap.  Surprised that wasn't the call.

Watching it live, it appeared they got instant pressure up the middle and sent extra guys hard off each edge.

If you know they're bringing pressure, which they typically always have in those situations, you gotta have a hot read or a quick outlet setup.  With them sending extra guys, you got to scheme someone open quick...  it looked to me, like Brady called something long-developing, the blocking failed, and that's why Teddy had nowhere to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Proudiddy said:

Watching it live, it appeared they got instant pressure up the middle and sent extra guys hard off each edge.

If you know they're bringing pressure, which they typically always have in those situations, you gotta have a hot read or a quick outlet setup.  With them sending extra guys, you got to scheme someone open quick...  it looked to me, like Brady called something long-developing, the blocking failed, and that's why Teddy had nowhere to go.

That is how I felt live, but I haven't seen a replay. I want to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In another post, Snow says about three years before you can properly grade a rookie class.  Sounds about right…
    • And this reiterates why I don’t want a Young contract extension. Please let us find another QB. 
    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
×
×
  • Create New...