Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Myles Jack before the deadline?


Rags

Recommended Posts

What say you?

He's frustrated with Jacksonville, and admittedly he has a kinda chunky price tag, but considering we're probably gonna take a LB in the top 3 rounds anyway, I'd offer a 3rd and end at a 2nd for a 25 year old athletic LB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We already have a big money non-pass rushing LB. I'm of the opinion you can't afford two.

Interesting.  We had Luke and Shaq. Neither of which could rush the passer. If Luke wanted to come back tomorrow I’m pretty sure we’d all be ecstatic, including you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We already have a big money non-pass rushing LB. I'm of the opinion you can't afford two.

I'm just sitting here livid we're paying about 3mil less for Shaq than the jags are paying for Jack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Smithers said:

Interesting.  We had Luke and Shaq. Neither of which could rush the passer. If Luke wanted to come back tomorrow I’m pretty sure we’d all be ecstatic, including you. 

Shaq was on his rookie contract Lukes time here.

We'd be paying around 80 mil if we had both.

I think it'd be partly worth it if we cut our losses on Shaq as soon as we can because Jack is a great talent but it's very risky still because we'd have little wiggleroom elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Smithers said:

Interesting.  We had Luke and Shaq. Neither of which could rush the passer. If Luke wanted to come back tomorrow I’m pretty sure we’d all be ecstatic, including you. 

Shaq was cheap(er) until the end of last year and I wouldn't be surprised at all if Luke already knew at that point he wasn't coming back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, and I'd cut Shaq after next season when we have an out. 

Wait we can bail next season?

Holy fug what joyus news.

Maybe he'll progress but Shaq has just been Eric Reid 2.0. So far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, and I'd cut Shaq after next season when we have an out. 

Wait we can bail next season?

Holy fug what joyus news.

Maybe he'll progress but Shaq has just been Eric Reid 2.0. So far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The teams this 2nd year player (can’t really blame the years before he was drafted on him) was playing were going 100% as most do most weeks in the NFL. The whole argument is about his play during that period and how well was he actually playing. I’m with you on the winning though. Just start winning and fans will get excited. Start getting in the playoffs and winning and we won’t care how his PFF or box score stats look. 200 yards a game to 400 yards a game, start scoring and winning playoffs games and 99% of fans will buy in. 
    • Yeah, we are gonna be raw.  Wonnum, for the past 3 years, has been averaging 8 sacks a season (4 in one season when he missed half a season).  I am OK, but yes, they will be thrown to the fire.
    • I like this because it means one or both of the rookies will be thrust into a bigger role right away and we can see what they might be. I don't like this because it just makes our team that much younger and inexperienced.  You need vets to help the young guys learn, I just hope we aren't going too far in the opposite direction.  All our FA signings were guys just coming off their rookie deals too, I get why we're doing it, but having the savvy vets help in other ways too.
×
×
  • Create New...